{"id":12131,"date":"2008-10-06T19:59:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-06T19:59:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/production.ou.org\/life\/other\/masechet_gittin_8490\/"},"modified":"2015-10-29T11:39:48","modified_gmt":"2015-10-29T16:39:48","slug":"masechet_gittin_8490","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/","title":{"rendered":"Masechet Gittin 84a-90b"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>The Coming Week&#8217;s Daf Yomi by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>This essay is based upon the insights and chidushim (original ideas) of Talmudic scholar Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, as published in the Hebrew version of the Steinsaltz Edition of the Talmud.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Gittin 84a-b<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Our <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/di.htm#gemara\">Gemara<\/a> continues the discussion of how to deal with a divorce that is given predicated on various conditions made by the husband. What if he makes the divorce conditional on actions that his wife cannot possibly perform? Among the examples offered by the <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=247&amp;letter=B&amp;search=baraita\">baraita<\/a><\/em> are that the <em>get<\/em> is given &#8211;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>On the condition that you climb up to the sky<\/li>\n<li>On the condition that you go down to the deepest depths<\/li>\n<li>On the condition that you swallow a board that is four cubits long<\/li>\n<li>On the condition that you cross the ocean by foot.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In all of these cases the <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/tw.htm#tanna\">Tanna<\/a> Kamma<\/em> rules that since the condition cannot be fulfilled, the divorce cannot take effect. Rabbi Yehuda ben Teima rules that this divorce does take effect, explaining that as a general rule when a condition is made that clearly cannot be fulfilled, we interpret the intention to be one of exaggeration, without any true significance. Since the condition cannot possibly be fulfilled, we view the establishment of the condition as words that have no meaning. Our Gemara concludes by stating that we follow Rabbi Yehuda ben Teima&#8217;s position.<\/p>\n<p>The Gemara continues by raising situations where the condition can, theoretically, be fulfilled, but it is something that is forbidden to do. Examples include &#8211;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>On the condition that you eat pork (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=120&amp;letter=A\">Abayye<\/a> views this case as being identical to the previous one that we discussed; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=5&amp;letter=R\">Rava<\/a> rules that here the woman can choose to eat pork, although if she does, she will be punished for doing so.)<\/li>\n<li>On the condition that you have sexual relations with a certain person. In this case all agree that if she has relations with him, the divorce takes effect. The <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/tw.htm#yerushalmi\">Talmud Yerushalmi<\/a><\/em> argues that she cannot really do this, since she is still married and the divorce has not yet taken effect. Nevertheless, when she engages in relations, the divorce takes effect retroactively, and she has not committed adultery.<strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong><u>Gittin 85a-b<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>According to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/m.htm#mishna\">Mishnah<\/a> on our <em>daf<\/em>, the central statement of the divorce document is the idea <em>harei at muteret le-chol adam<\/em> &#8211; &#8220;behold you are permitted to any person,&#8221; a statement that breaks the bonds of the existing marriage. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=632&amp;letter=J\">Rabbi Yehuda<\/a> says that it must say that this <em>get<\/em> (writ of divorce) will act as a document of divorce; a letter of abandonment and a writ of freedom, permitting the woman to marry any man that she desires.<\/p>\n<p>According to most of the <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/r.htm#rishon\">rishonim<\/a><\/em>, even the first opinion would not allow a woman to marry based solely on that statement; clearly the <em>get<\/em> must also include the names of the husband and wife as well as other pertinent information. Nevertheless, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=269&amp;letter=I\">Ri&#8221;d<\/a> writes that the simple statement of <em>harei at muteret le-chol adam<\/em> would suffice to effect a divorce assuming that there are proper witnesses who can attest to the transfer of the document.<\/p>\n<p>With regard to Rabbi Yehuda&#8217;s ruling, there is some discussion as to whether his expanded version of the statement replaces the basic idea expressed in the words <em>harei at muteret le-khol adam<\/em> or if he still requires that language to be included. The latter position \u2013 which is accepted by the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=905&amp;letter=M\">Rambam<\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=910&amp;letter=M\">Ramban<\/a> and others \u2013 can be explained by the fact that the language mandated by Rabbi Yehuda specifically allows the woman to remarry, but does not clearly state that she is a single woman. The difference would be if she engaged in a sexual relationship without getting married. Did the <em>get<\/em> allow her to do so, or did the original husband only release her to get married? This lack of clarity obligates the husband to include a clear statement permitting her to all. Others disagree, arguing that a divorce clearly ends the marriage, and without any marital bonds, the woman is clearly free to engage in whatever behaviors she sees fit.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong><u>Gittin 86a-b<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/m.htm#mishna\">Mishnah<\/a> that was discussed on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.steinsaltz.org\/dynamic\/DafYomi_details.asp?Id=1147\">yesterday&#8217;s <em>daf<\/em><\/a> segues from a discussion of the correct language in a document of divorce to present that language that should be used when a slave or a maidservant is set free. The two suggested expressions are <em>harei at bat horin<\/em> \u2013 &#8220;behold, you are a free woman&#8221; or <em>harei at le-atzmekh<\/em> \u2013 &#8220;behold, you belong to yourself.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Some of the commentaries ask why <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=632&amp;letter=J\">Rabbi Yehuda<\/a> does not require a greater clarification of the freedom that is being offered to the slave, just as he requires it regarding divorces (see <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.steinsaltz.org\/dynamic\/DafYomi_details.asp?Id=1147\">daf 85<\/a><\/em>). The <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/rabbis\/sofer.htm\">Chatam Sofer<\/a><\/em> suggests that since many codifiers ruled that a slave can be released with a simple statement, and that the document serves merely to be a record of the transfer of ownership, Rabbi Yehuda does not believe that it would be necessary to be very specific in the document.<\/p>\n<p>In the context of this discussion, our <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/di.htm#gemara\">Gemara<\/a> brings a ruling made by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=626&amp;letter=J\">Rav Yehuda<\/a>, who required that the record of sale, transferring ownership of a slave from one person to another, should include statements assuring the purchaser that the slave is fully owned by the individual who is selling him with no claims on him from the government or from any other individual. Furthermore, the record of sale assures the purchaser that the slave does not suffer from any diseases, nor does he have any other <em>mumim<\/em> &#8211; blemishes &#8211; on his person.<\/p>\n<p>The commentaries point out that ordinarily these assurances should not be necessary, since the general principle is that the purchaser of a slave cannot claim that the purchase should be nullified because of a <em>mu\u00ad\u00adm<\/em> \u2013 either the blemish is significant enough that the sale is automatically or if it is not so significant we can assume that the purchaser checked and was aware of the <em>mum<\/em> beforehand. Thus Rav Yehuda&#8217;s version of the record of sale requires the statement to be made in order to help people from misunderstandings and complaints against each other.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong><u>Gittin 87a-b<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/m.htm#mishna\">Mishnah<\/a> on our <em>daf<\/em> discusses a situation where two <em>gittin<\/em> (divorce documents) are written on a single parchment, one next to the other, and are signed by two groups of witnesses. The case presented by the Mishnah raises questions about the witnesses&#8217; signatures, and, in particular, the issue of witnesses who sign in Latin. \u00a0According to the Mishnah, if we have two signatures in Hebrew, one after another, and then two signatures in Latin, one after another, the <em>get<\/em> would be fine. If, however, there was a mix between Hebrew names and Latin names, then the <em>get<\/em> cannot be used.<\/p>\n<p>The assumption appears to be that in the first case one set of witnesses is attesting to the <em>get<\/em> on the right, while the other set is attesting to the set on the left. In the second case, however, we are concerned lest the Latin signers may have mimicked or changes their own signatures, based on what the Hebrew signers did before them.<\/p>\n<p>Two approaches are offered to explain the case of the Latin signers. According to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/rashi.htm\">Rashi<\/a>, all of the witnesses used Hebrew letters in their signatures, and that some of the people who signed the two <em>gittin<\/em> shared the same line while signing. The concern is that one of the Latin signers may have copied the writing style from the Hebrew signer and switched the order of his name and his father&#8217;s name. The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=905&amp;letter=M\">Rambam<\/a> suggests that one set of witnesses actually used Latin characters when signing their names. According to this approach, even though each name was written on a separate line, still there is a concern that one of the signers in Latin copied the order of the witness who signed before him and may have confused his name with his father&#8217;s name.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong><u>Gittin 88a-b<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As we have seen throughout <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/m.htm#masechet\">Masechet<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.steinsaltz.org\/dynamic\/DafYomi_details.asp?id=1061\">Gittin<\/a><\/em>, according to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/torah.htm\">Torah<\/a> law only the husband can act to divorce his wife; the wife does not have the power to create a divorce. Are there any situations where she can appeal to the courts to force her husband to offer her a divorce?<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/m.htm#mishna\">Mishnah<\/a> on our <em>daf<\/em> teaches that if a <em>bet din<\/em> \u2013 a Jewish court \u2013 forces the husband to give a <em>get<\/em>, the divorce will take effect. If it is a non-Jewish court that forces him to give a <em>get<\/em>, no divorce takes place. If, however, the Jewish court rules that the husband should divorce his wife, but they do not have the power to force him to give a <em>get<\/em>, they can turn to the secular courts and arrange for them to force him to follow their ruling.<\/p>\n<p>The <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/tw.htm#yerushalmi\">Talmud Yerushalmi<\/a><\/em> considers the possibility that a Jewish court will only force someone to grant a divorce if the marriage is a forbidden union (for example, a <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/jl.htm#kohen\">kohen<\/a><\/em> who married a divorcee). The <em>Yerushalmi<\/em>&#8216;s conclusion, however, is that the court can make this decision for other reasons, as well, e.g. if he behaves inappropriately towards his wife.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=905&amp;letter=M\">Rambam<\/a> (<em>Mishnah, Hilkhot Gerushin<\/em>, 2:20) asks how the <em>bet din<\/em> could force someone to offer a <em>get<\/em> \u2013 shouldn&#8217;t he be considered an <em>anoos<\/em> (someone forced to perform an action against his will) \u2013 whose actions are considered null and void? The Rambam explains that the idea of <em>anoos<\/em> is that a person is forced to do something that he is not obligated to do. Someone who is obligated to perform a certain action \u2013 for example, if he is instructed by the <em>bet din<\/em> to perform that action \u2013 cannot be considered forced against his will to do it, since we believe that every Jewish person wants to do what is right and just. Therefore we perceive the situation as being different than what it appears to be \u2013 really this individual wants to give the <em>get<\/em>, and it is his <em>yetzer ha-ra<\/em> \u2013 his evil inclination \u2013 that is keeping him from doing the right thing. Thus, forcing him to agree that he desires to give the <em>get<\/em>, in actuality is allowing him to do what he really wants to do.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong><u>Gittin 89a-b<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/m.htm#mishna\">Mishnah<\/a> on the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.steinsaltz.org\/dynamic\/DafYomi_details.asp?Id=1150\">last <em>daf<\/em> <\/a>\u00a0discusses how we are to deal with rumors about a woman&#8217;s marital status. According to the Mishnah, if there are rumors that a woman has gotten married we must take such statements seriously, at least to the extent that we will obligate her to get a divorce before allowing her to marry someone else. If the rumors indicate that she was divorced, we will trust those rumors, as well, and treat her as a divorced woman.<\/p>\n<p>In the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/di.htm#gemara\">Gemara<\/a> on our <em>daf<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=12&amp;letter=U\">Ulla<\/a> points out that this ruling does not apply to simple rumors, rather to rumors that have a solid basis. An example of that would be that there is a wedding hall prepared, with guests coming and going, and the guests say that they have come for a specific person&#8217;s wedding. A question that is raised by the <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/r.htm#rishon\">rishonim<\/a><\/em> is how the rumors of a divorce may be substantiated. Some suggest that this is just an example, and the intent of the Gemara is to teach that the community leaders are obligated to make inquiries to substantiate the rumors before acting on them. The <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/tw.htm#yerushalmi\">Talmud Yerushalmi<\/a><\/em> argues that we must distinguish between weddings, which often involve public festivities and divorces that are usually arranged privately. Since there is no possibility that we can find a parallel source for the rumors of a divorce, we are more open to accept what is considered &#8220;common knowledge&#8221; in the community.<\/p>\n<p>What is clear in the Gemara is that we reject rumors that ascribe various negative attributes or behaviors to a given woman. Therefore, if there are unsubstantiated rumors that that a woman got engaged, got married, committed adultery or has a checked family background, we do not give credence to those rumors. The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/rabbis\/meiri.htm\">Me&#8217;iri<\/a> writes that in all such cases, not only will the <em>bet din<\/em> \u2013 the Jewish court \u2013 refuse to accept those rumors itself, but it is obligated to tell anyone who asks that the rumors cannot be accepted as being true.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong><u>Gittin 90a-b<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/m.htm#mishna\">Mishnah<\/a> appears on this, the last <em>daf<\/em> in <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/m.htm#masechet\">Masechet<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.steinsaltz.org\/dynamic\/DafYomi_details.asp?id=1061\">Gittin<\/a>,<\/em> that deals with one of the most basic questions about divorce. According to Jewish law, what are considered reasonable grounds for divorce? The Mishnah brings three opinions on this matter:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Bet <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=549&amp;letter=S\">Shammai<\/a><\/em> rules that a man can divorce his wife only if he found a <em>davar ervah<\/em> \u2013 a promiscuous situation.<\/li>\n<li><em>Bet <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=730&amp;letter=H\">Hillel<\/a><\/em> permits divorce even in a case where the wife <em>hikdichah tavshilo<\/em> (literally &#8220;burned his food&#8221;).<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=1033&amp;letter=A\">Rabbi Akiva<\/a> says that he can divorce her for any reason \u2013 even if he found another woman who he finds more attractive.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Each of these three <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/tw.htm#tanna\">tanna&#8217;im<\/a><\/em> points to a biblical passage as a source for their positions. Both <em>Bet Shammai<\/em> and <em>Bet Hillel<\/em> rely on the <em>pasuk<\/em> that says <em>ki matzah bah ervat davar<\/em> \u2013 that he found a matter of promiscuity. <em>Bet Shammai<\/em> emphasizes the word &#8220;promiscuity&#8221; while <em>Bet Hillel<\/em> believes that the key word is <em>davar<\/em> \u2013 anything. Rabbi Akiva&#8217;s source is the beginning of the <em>pasuk<\/em> &#8211; <em>ve-hayah im lo timtzah hen be-einav<\/em> \u2013 if she does not find favor in his eyes.<\/p>\n<p>The <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/tw.htm#yerushalmi\">Talmud Yerushalmi<\/a><\/em> emphasizes that Bet Shammai&#8217;s position does not require that the husband actually discover that his wife has committed adultery, rather that any promiscuous behaviors can be grounds for divorce.<\/p>\n<p><em>Bet Hillel<\/em>&#8216;s ruling seems rather callous, and, in fact, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/rashi.htm\">Rashi<\/a> offers two possible explanations for how the wife may have ruined the food \u2013 either by burning it or by putting in too much salt. Based on the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishencyclopedia.com\/view.jsp?artid=905&amp;letter=M\">Rambam<\/a>, who explains <em>Bet Hillel<\/em>&#8216;s position as referring to a woman whose attitude and behavior do not match that of her husband, the <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ou.org\/about\/judaism\/rabbis\/sofer.htm\">Chatam Sofer<\/a><\/em> suggests that the expression used by <em>Bet Hillel<\/em> does not refer to ruining the food, rather as a metaphor whose meaning is that if the husband finds his wife to be distasteful, then he would be allowed to divorce her.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><em>In addition to his monumental translation and commentary on the Talmud, Rabbi Steinsaltz has authored dozens of books and hundreds of articles on a variety of topics, both Jewish and secular. For more information about Rabbi Steinsaltz&#8217;s groundbreaking work in Jewish education, visit <a href=\"http:\/\/www.steinsaltz.org\/\">www.steinsaltz.org<\/a> or contact the Aleph Society at 212-840-1166.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Coming Week&#8217;s Daf Yomi by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz This essay is based upon the insights and chidushim (original ideas) of Talmudic scholar Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, as published in the Hebrew version of the Steinsaltz Edition of the Talmud. Gittin 84a-b Our Gemara continues the discussion of how to deal with a divorce that is<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":125,"featured_media":43837,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[83],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-torah","series-steinsaltz-daf-yomi"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Masechet Gittin 84a-90b - OU Life<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Coming Week&#039;s Daf Yomi (Gittin 84a-90b) by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, based upon the insights &amp; chidushim published in the Steinsaltz Edition of the Talmud\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Masechet Gittin 84a-90b - OU Life\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Coming Week&#039;s Daf Yomi (Gittin 84a-90b) by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, based upon the insights &amp; chidushim published in the Steinsaltz Edition of the Talmud\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"OU Life\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-06T19:59:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-29T16:39:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/files\/\u05d2\u05d8.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"636\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"483\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/\",\"name\":\"Masechet Gittin 84a-90b - OU Life\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/files\/\u05d2\u05d8.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-06T19:59:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-29T16:39:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/#\/schema\/person\/7a32de488ccffdeab4abf82b42a6c4e1\"},\"description\":\"The Coming Week's Daf Yomi (Gittin 84a-90b) by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, based upon the insights & chidushim published in the Steinsaltz Edition of the Talmud\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/files\/\u05d2\u05d8.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/files\/\u05d2\u05d8.jpg\",\"width\":636,\"height\":483,\"caption\":\"\u05d2\u05d8\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/\",\"name\":\"OU Life\",\"description\":\"Everyday Jewish Living\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/#\/schema\/person\/7a32de488ccffdeab4abf82b42a6c4e1\",\"name\":\"Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b58507ea203a8aa2be80e4feca4ca54162e515258656928aab572c91c3ed85d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b58507ea203a8aa2be80e4feca4ca54162e515258656928aab572c91c3ed85d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/author\/rabbi_adin_steinsaltzou-org\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Masechet Gittin 84a-90b - OU Life","description":"The Coming Week's Daf Yomi (Gittin 84a-90b) by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, based upon the insights & chidushim published in the Steinsaltz Edition of the Talmud","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Masechet Gittin 84a-90b - OU Life","og_description":"The Coming Week's Daf Yomi (Gittin 84a-90b) by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, based upon the insights & chidushim published in the Steinsaltz Edition of the Talmud","og_url":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/","og_site_name":"OU Life","article_published_time":"2008-10-06T19:59:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-29T16:39:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":636,"height":483,"url":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/files\/\u05d2\u05d8.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/","url":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/","name":"Masechet Gittin 84a-90b - OU Life","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/files\/\u05d2\u05d8.jpg","datePublished":"2008-10-06T19:59:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-29T16:39:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/#\/schema\/person\/7a32de488ccffdeab4abf82b42a6c4e1"},"description":"The Coming Week's Daf Yomi (Gittin 84a-90b) by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, based upon the insights & chidushim published in the Steinsaltz Edition of the Talmud","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/torah\/masechet_gittin_8490\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/files\/\u05d2\u05d8.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/files\/\u05d2\u05d8.jpg","width":636,"height":483,"caption":"\u05d2\u05d8"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/","name":"OU Life","description":"Everyday Jewish Living","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/#\/schema\/person\/7a32de488ccffdeab4abf82b42a6c4e1","name":"Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b58507ea203a8aa2be80e4feca4ca54162e515258656928aab572c91c3ed85d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b58507ea203a8aa2be80e4feca4ca54162e515258656928aab572c91c3ed85d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz"},"url":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/author\/rabbi_adin_steinsaltzou-org\/"}]}},"acf":[],"brizy_media":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/125"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12131"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12131\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50574,"href":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12131\/revisions\/50574"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/43837"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ou.org\/life\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}