Parshat Mishpatim [P> X:Y (Z)] and [S> X:Y (Z)] indicate start of a parsha p’tucha or s’tuma respectively. X:Y is Perek:Pasuk of the beginning of the parsha; (Z) is the number of p'sukim in the parsha. Numbers in [square brackets] are the Mitzva-count of Sefer HaChinuch AND Rambam’s Sefer HaMitzvot. A=ASEI (positive mitzva); L=LAV (prohibition). X:Y is the perek and pasuk from which the mitzva comes. When a mitzva is mentioned and no numbers are indicated, it means that the mitzva is counted elsewhere, but is still found in Mishpatim. This being the case, it makes Mishpatim even more mitzva-filled than its already high count indicates.
Kohen - First Aliya -19 p'sukim - 21:1-19 [By the way, if the SHIFCHA and/or the children are subsequently freed, they become Jews - unrelated to their "husband" or biological father, the former EVED IVRI. The process is analogous to conversion. It's more complicated than presented, does not apply in our time, but that's the idea.] If the EVED IVRI wants to remain in his master's service, his ear is pierced (a symbolic rebuke: "The ear that heard at Sinai that we are G-d's servants, should not want to be a servant to a servant.") and now he serves "forever" (until Yovel). The details of EVED IVRI constitute a positive commandment [42,A232 21:1]. SDT: Of all the topics to begin this mitzva-filled sedra, we see a significance in the Torah's choice of SERVITUDE. This is part of the definition of Belief in G-d, the first Commandment. G-d puts Himself in the context of He Who freed us from slavery. We should not be slaves anymore; and we probably shouldn't have any. But at a time when it was still practiced, we are duty-bound to treat the EVED in the manner commanded by the Torah, thus reflecting our belief in G-d. In fact, the Gemara says that he who acquires an EVED (IVRI), it is as if he has acquired a master. One blanket in cold weather - the EVED gets it, not the "owner". No humiliating treatment permitted. And more. As you can tell by the large number of parshiyot, the many topics and mitzvot are subdivided well in this sedra. This indicates not only many mitzvot, but many different types and categories of mitzvot. The first parsha deals with EVED IVRI, as just explained, and is introduced by the opening pasuk of this entire mitzva-filled sedra - And these are the laws that you shall place before them... [S> 21:7 (5)] A man can arrange for his daughter to be "in service". She, the AMA IVRIYA, does not have the same rules as an EVED IVRI. Either her master, master's son, or someone else, takes her as a wife [43,A233 21:8] with the full rights and respect accorded a Jewish wife - NOT LESS [46,L262 21:10], or she is to be redeemed or returned to her family [44,A234 21:8], but she may not be sold to anyone else [45,L261 21:8] or belittled or disgraced. The alternative to the above options is to free her completely. (Apparently, the purpose of AMA IVRIYA is to help the young girl improve her status in society.) MitzvaWatch: It is interesting and important to note that mitzva #46 includes giving ALL wives (not just the former maidservant) their rights under Jewish Law. This is an example (there are others) of a mitzva whose context in the Written Torah is narrow, but whose scope, as taught to us by the Oral Torah, is much broader. Please note that this is NOT a case of Rabbinic extension of Torah Law, nor of Rabbinic legislation. It is a DEFINITION of the Torah's intent, as transmitted to us via the Oral Tradition. Our Sages did both - transmit G-d's law and legislate their laws... and teach us which is which. [S> 21:12 (2)] Murder is punishable by beheading, known as HEREG or SAYIF. This is an example of the Torah's presenting both a warning - LO TIRTZACH, Thou shalt not murder, and a punishment - He who strikes a man and he dies, he shall be put to death. There are 4 capital punishments, each fitting particular crimes and sins. Rambam counts four separate mitzvot commanding the courts to carry out executions when someone is thus sentenced. At this point in Mishpatim, Rambam counts the mitzva to execute by strangulation he who is tried, convicted, and sentenced for a sin whose punishment is strangulation [47,A227 21:12]. (It seems that this mitzva was meant to link to 21:16 below, because the punishment fits that context.) Unintentional killers are provided with a place of refuge. [S> 21:14 (1)] Intentional murderers who flee to a city of refuge are forcibly returned to stand judgment. [S> 21:15 (1)] Striking one's parent (and drawing blood) is a capital offense [48,L319 21:15]. [S> 21:16 (1)] Kidnapping (which was prohibited by LO TIGNOV, Commandment #8) is a capital offense if the kidnapper sells the victim into slavery. (Rashi explains the seeming anomaly in the text.) [S> 21:17 (1)] Cursing one's parent (even after death) is a capital offense. [S> 21:18 (2)] If one inflicts a non-fatal injury upon another, he must pay full compensation based on five factors: damage, pain, insult, expenses, and lost earning potential [49,A236 21:18]. Implied in this concluding portion of the first Aliya is our Jewish and human obligation and challenge to heal the sick. This derives from the double wording of V'RAPO Y'RAPEI. We do not see G-d as the only healer, so to speak. Of course, everything depends upon G-d, but He expects us, so to speak, to do our share of the task of healing. He supervises that, and takes over when we've done all we can. (The plain meaning of V'RAPO Y'RAPEI is that part of the payment required of the one who caused the injury is covering the medical expenses.)
Levi - Second Aliya - 21 p'sukim - 21:20-22:3 [S> 21:22 (4)] The Torah next elaborates on the rules of personal injuries requiring the guilty party to pay compensatory damages. The famous "an eye for an eye..." passage has stimulated much slander against the Torah and Judaism by being construed literally. Our Oral Tradition explains the passage as requiring a thorough evaluation by the court to determine the proper amounts to be paid to the injured party. [S> 21:26 (2)] A few p'sukim back, the Torah was discussing killing a slave or just injuring him mildly. Here the Torah teaches that if striking a slave causes the loss of an eye... or even a tooth, the slave must be freed. [P> 21:28 (5)] The next passage of the Torah deals with damages caused by one's ox (all animals are included; the Torah uses a practical example) [51,A237 21:28]. We distinguish between damages that can, and therefore must be foreseen by the owner (for which he is held completely responsible), as opposed to an unexpected and unusual action by the animal that causes damage, for which the owner is held only partially responsible. An animal that kills a human, is to be destroyed by stoning and its carcass may not benefit anyone [52,L188 21:29]. [S> 21:33 (2)] The Torah then discusses damages caused by a pit dug in the ground and negligently left uncovered [53,A238 21:33]. The Gemara enumerates various categories of damages. Each case is to be examined on its own merits, so that the fairest treatment of the parties will result. For example... [S> 21:35 (2)] If an ox owned by one person gores the ox of another person and kills it, then the two owners share the responsibility and each gets 50% of the value of both the live ox and the dead one. But if the ox that gored had developed a reputation for violent attacks, then its owner is held more accountable. He gives his live ox to the other owner and takes the carcass of the dead ox. It has value, but not as much as a live ox. [S> 21:37 (4)] Stealing an animal for slaughter or sale is punished by compensation of 4-5 times market value. This reflects the seriousness of stealing another person's livelihood. If a thief is caught "red-handed" and is killed by the home-owner, there are certain circumstances for which the killing would be justified, and other cases where it would be considered criminal homocide. This is the very sensitive passage that deals with self-defense and preemptive action to protect oneself. The Torah presents both possibilities; it is a Court (of 23) that would have to rule on specific cases and perhaps provide us with rough guidelines to distinguish between cases. This is the Torah source of "He who comes to kill you, beat him to the draw (so to speak) and kill him first." HABA L’HARGECHA, HASHKEM L’HORGO. This "permission" to kill is conditional upon it being the only way to save yourself. This is part of what makes this issue so sensitive. It is a "judgment call" on the part of the person, and, literally, a judgment call on the part of the Beit Din. A thief who voluntarily turns himself in repays that which he stole. (In certain cases where a false oath compounded a theft, there can be an added penalty of “one fifth - 25% more than the principal.) If a thief is caught, he pays double [54,A239 22:2], or 4-5 times in the case of livestock, as mentioned above. A thief (male, not female) who cannot make full restitution can be sold by the court as an Eved Ivri in order to pay off his debts.
Shlishi - Third Aliya - 23 p'sukim - 22:4-26 [S> 22:5 (1)] So too, if damages result from a fire that one carelessly caused, he must pay damages. [56,A241 22:5]. [S> 22:6 (4)] Next, the Torah presents the responsibilities of guardianship - when one is watching that which belongs to someone else without being paid for the service, then the guardian is responsible if something happens to that which he is watching, only if he was negligent in his guardianship. Properly carrying out the laws of the SHOMEIR CHINAM is counted as a positive mitzva [57,A242 22:6]. [S> 22:9 (4)] There are differences in the rules in the case that the guardian is being paid for his services. E.g. paying someone to house-sit while one is on vacation. Because the guardian is being compensated for his watching, he is held responsible for some situations besides his own negligence. These rules also constitute a mitzva [59,A243 22:9]. Included in the rules for SHOMEIR SACHAR are the rules for renting and leasing (SOCHEIR). Shomeir Sachar and Socheir are similar and different. Shomer Sachar may not use that which he is watching (without permission of the owner). Socheir obviously can use the object - that's why he rented it. But the similarity is this: both the owner and the shomeir benefit from their deal. The owner gets his object guarded or he gets the rental fee. The shomeir gets paid for his services or has the benefit of the use of the object. With the Shomeir Chinam, the owner gets the benefit and the guardian is doing him a favor. With the borrowing, the borrower gets the benefit and the owner is doing him a favor. This impacts on what the Shomer is or isn't held liable for. The courts are charged [58,A246 22:8] with careful handling all of these types of cases. [P> 22:13 (2)] The fourth "guardian" is the borrower who is responsible for all losses except the death of a work animal in the normal course of work [60,A244 22:13], (and by extension, the ruin of an object from "normal wear & tear"). [S> 22:15 (2)] A man who seduces an unmarried woman is required to pay punitive damages to her &/or her father. And he must marry her, if she insists [61,A220 22:15]. [S> 22:17 (2)] Sorcery is a capital offense, and it is forbidden for the courts not to judge and execute its practitioners [62,L310 22:17]. Bestiality is a capital offense. [S> 22:19 (8)] Sacrificing to a god other than HaShem is condemned (to death). A convert to Judaism must not be embarrassed or taken advantage of with words [63,L252 22:20] or in money matters [64,L253 22:20]. These rules vis-à-vis the Ger are in addition to the "regular" prohibitions of embarrassing and taking advantage of any Jew. Thus the Torah sensitizes us to the plight of the more vulnerable members of our society. The Torah also spells this out vis-à-vis the orphan and widow [65,L256 22:21]. With so many different parshiyot to handle so many different mitzvot, it is instructive to notice which mitzvot find themselves in a single parsha. Here we find the requirements of sensitive behavior towards the convert, widow and orphan sharing a parsha with sacrificing to idolatry. One can imagine G-d saying to us, be very careful, I take this as seriously as that. Mistreat a GER? That to Me is as serious as if you mistreated Me, so to speak. [P> 22:24 (3)] It is a mitzva to lend money to a poor person [66,A197 22:24] and not demand repayment when none is reasonably forthcoming [67,L234 22:24]. Included in this passage is the prohibition of charging interest on personal loans or having any part in such a loan [68,L237 22:20]. If one took a poor person's bedding as security for a loan, it must be returned each evening for his use. This is but one of the many lesson's in the Torah in G'milut Chasadim. Note that the Torah requires a behavior of us that is far above the standards of the world, even the civilized world. The rest of the world recognizes that taking advantage of people by charging exorbitant interest is wrong. Usury or loan-sharking is understood to be improper by most societies. Charging a "reasonable" amount of interest is universally accepted as okay. Except within the Jewish community. People might not always live up to G-d's expectations of us, but we are supposed to. This is our raison d'etre.
R'vi'i - Fourth Aliya - 9 p'sukim - 22:27-23:5 Do not withhold the gifts of the produce - T'ruma, Maaser, etc. - nor confuse the order in which these gifts should be taken from produce [72, L154 22:28]. Firstborn sons are to "be given to G-d" (i.e. redeemed, Pidyon HaBen). First- born cows, goats, and sheep are sanctified and require special procedures. The Torah here briefly mentions the prohibition of taking an animal for a korban from its mother before it is eight days old. Such a korban would be automatically invalid, a M'CHUSAR Z'MAN, lacking in time. TREIFA, literally an animal torn up by a predator and left to die, is forbidden to eat (even though the animal was actually killed by sh'chita, ritual slaughter), but other benefits may be derived from it. Included in the laws of TREIFA are animals found, upon post-mortem examination, to have specific defects [73,L181 22:30]. Note that the term TREIF is also used for all non-kosher, but its specific meaning is as above. How's that for an interesting collection of mitzvot to be contained within one parsha! [S> 23:1 (3)] Courts many not hear one side of a dispute without the other party being present [74,L281 23:1]. Included in this prohibition is not being influenced by rumors. Judges may not accept testimony from unworthy witnesses [75,L286 23:1]. A majority of one is not sufficient to convict in capital or corporal cases [76,L282 23:2]. In their deliberations, judges must be careful not to do anything that might pervert justice or unfairly shift the feelings of the court against the accused [77, L283 23:2]. Generally, rules of law are determined by majority vote of the judges [78, A175 23:2]. Judges may not show favoritism, even towards the less fortunate [79,L277 23:3]. SDT: A judge's heart might go out to a poor person who stands before him in a dispute with a wealthy man. Would it not be an act of kindness, of Chessed, to see to it that the poor person wins the dispute? NO! Not at the expense of justice. A judge wants to give charity? Fine. He wants to convince the rich guy to help the poor guy out? Nice. But justice must be fairly meted out. Every bent case shakes the whole society's confidence in the justice system. [S> 23:4 (1)] If one finds a stray animal, he shall return it to its rightful owner (even if it involves personal expense). This command is related to Lost & Found whose "primary" place is Ki Teitzei. [S> 23:5 (1)] One must help even his enemy unload his beast of burden [80,A202 23:5]. This mitzva is one of several that are considered the sources of the concept of TZAAR BAALEI CHAYIM. SDT: Sefer HaChinuch says that if this mitzva applies to a donkey, how much more so does it apply to humans. If one sees a fellow person loaded down with bundles, it is a Torah mitzva to help him with them. And what might follow from that idea is that when someone offers to help you with packages, don't immediately say "no thank you". It is a nice thing to be gracious and accept the help - good for you and a merit for the one offering. By the way, when someone does a mitzva that is also helpful to you, it is proper to say THANK YOU and TIZKEH L'MITZVOT (not just Tizkeh L'mitzvot). Thank you addresses the BEIN ADAM L'CHAVEIRO aspect of what was done, and Tizkeh L'Mitzvot relates to the BEIN ADAM LAMAKOM.
Chamishi - Fifth Aliya - 14 p'sukim - 23:6-19 Swearing in the name of (and sometimes even just mentioning) a deity is forbidden [96,L14 23:13]. In the spirit of this mitzva, one should avoid popular interjections whose origins are associated with other religions - Gee!, Holy cow! Etc. Inciting others to idolatry (even with- out worshiping) is forbidden [87,L15 23:13]. Chagiga offerings in the Mikdash are to be brought on each of the Three Festivals [88,A52 23:14]. Matzot are to be eaten during the 7 days of Pesach. It marks the Spring season during which we left Egypt. We must not appear empty-handed at the Temple (but rather bring specific Festival sacrifices). Shavuot is the Festival of the First Harvest and Sukkot marks the final harvest at "the turn of the year". We are expected to go to Jerusalem for the Three Festivals. The Korban Pesach may not be brought while we are in possession of Chametz [89,L115 23:18] nor may its fats be left over for the morning [90,L116 23:18]. Bikurim are to be brought to the Mikdash from Shavuot time and on [91,A125 23:19]; it is forbidden to cook meat with milk [92,L186 23:19]. This is the first of three times that the Torah commands LO T'VASHEIL... Rambam, Chinuch, and others consider the first time to be the prohibition of cooking meat in milk, regardless of who does or doesn't eat or benefit from the result. The act of cooking itself is a Torah violation.
Shishi - Sixth Aliya - 6 p'sukim - 23:20-25 We must heed his words so that our enemies will fall before us. We may not bow to idols, nor worship them, nor learn from the deeds of pagans; we must destroy their idols. We must serve G-d and He will bless us with wealth and health.
Sh'vi'i - Seventh Aliya - 26 p'sukim - 23:26-24:18 SDT: Wait a minute! Miracles, laws of nature turned upside down. Plagues. Splitting of the Sea. Manna. Water from this and that. MA PITOM that we will only take over the Land of Israel slowly? What about a couple of miracles to handle the problem? The answer is that miracles are nice, but we don't live by them. We get them when we need them. But if the purpose of going (coming) to Eretz Yisrael is to live a Torah life in the place it was made for, then we have to do it naturally. This is the difference between the suspended animation experience of the Midbar and the down to earth, practical life in Eretz Yisrael. We may not make treaties with the 7 Nations nor with other idolaters [93, L48 23:32], nor shall we permit idolaters a foothold in the Land [94,L51 23:33], so that we will not be entrapped by them. [P> 24:1 (11)] The sedra concludes with a description of Matan Torah, including the famous NAASEH V'NISHMA response of the People to the offer of a Torah way of Life. Some of the things described in this portion "confuse" commentaries as to when they exactly happened. [S> 24:12 (7)] This final parsha of Mishpatim seems to be the immediate aftermath of Matan Torah - really a continuation of it. G-d tells Moshe that He will be giving him the Luchot AND the Torah and the mitzvot. (If anyone you know thinks that all G-d gave us at Sinai, just show him the end of Mishpatim.) After six days of "cloud- cover", which prevented Moshe from ascending Har Sinai, he is then welcomed on the 7th day. He remains on the mountain for 40 days and 40 nights. Maftir 2nd Torah 6 p'sukim Shmot 30:11-16 Although the ½-Shekel collection was used for the census, its main purpose was to provide funds (to which all Jews contributed equally) for communal offerings and other specific Mikdash needs throughout the year. It was on Rosh Chodesh Adar that announcements were made throughout Israel to remind people to get their half-shekel ready for collection. One of the ways we commemorate this mitzva is the reading of Parshat Sh'kalim on the Shabbat of (not common) or before (common) Rosh Chodesh Adar.
Haftara - 17 p'sukim - Melachim Bet 12:1-17 (Sfaradim start 4 p'sukim earlier) Rabbi Julian Jacobs z"l in "A Haftara Companion", suggests the following: “A message of both the sedra and the haftara is that Jews in each generation have duties towards the upkeep of the Synagogue and other communal causes. Apart from the practical financial benefits this brings, the acceptance of this responsibility has contributed to the inner strength of the Jewish people down the ages.” S'faradim and some Ashkenazi communities add the first and last p'sukim of the Machar Chodesh. Minhag Yerushalayim is not to add the p'sukim. [The Parshat Mishpatim Homepage]
|
