Torah tidbits
Parshat Bo

MISC section - contents:
[1] Vebbe Rebbe
[2] Candle by Day
[3] From Aloh Naaleh
[4] A Touch of Wisdom, A Touch of Wit
[5] Parsha Points to Ponder
[6] Portion from the Portion
[7] From the desk of the director

[1] From the virtual desk of the OU VEBBE REBBE

The Orthodox Union – via its website – fields questions of all types in areas of kashrut, Jewish law and values. Some of them are answered by Eretz Hemdah, the Institute for Advanced Jewish Studies, Jerusalem, headed by Rav Yosef Carmel and Rav Moshe Ehrenreich, founded by HaRav Shaul Yisraeli zt"l, to prepare rabbanim and dayanim to serve the National Religious community in Israel and abroad. Ask the Rabbi is a joint venture of the OU, Yerushalayim Network, Eretz Hemdah... and the Israel Center. The following is a Q&A from Eretz Hemdah...

Q: I am a young rabbi; I have begun looking for rabbinical positions. I have tried to work on anava (humility), but now people advise me to write an impressive resume and stress my talents to potential employers. Should I be leading this double life, or is there some fallacy here?

A: The attribute of anava is extremely important, and according to some, is the most important one (Avoda Zara 20b). The Rambam writes that it is the one area where one should not follow the golden mean. That being said, by under- standing the nature of humility, one can apply it in a livable manner.

Going through classical sources on anava and its opposite, ga'ava, (such as in Maharal's Neitvot Olam and Orchot Tzadikim), one finds clearly that humility is primarily related to what one thinks and feels, rather than what he says. Speech is just one way in which one's feelings become known to others. The offense of haughtiness is not only in the way it makes others feel but, philosophically, in how one views himself within Hashem's world. A perfect G-d created a world in which each person has the potential to leave his mark, but he does not become the ruler or the center of the little world around him. Failure to understand this is an affront to the Creator and Ruler Who commanded him to think about other individuals and community.

Let us give two of many sources that illustrate some of these ideas. R. Yochanan says (Sota 4b) that whoever is haughty is as if he denies the existence of Hashem, as it says: "…and your heart will be high, and you will forget Hashem, your G-d." This puts haughtiness in the theological realm as we have posited. The gemara (Megila 31a) says: "Wherever you see Hashem's greatness, you see His humility." It then brings p'sukim that extol Hashem's greatness, followed by a pasuk that Hashem loves and helps the stranger. If humility depends on what one says about himself, this makes no sense. How is Hashem humble if He says in His Torah that not only is He great, but He also cares for the weak? Rather, the gemara means that Hashem does not use his greatness to build Himself up but to help others. Ga'ava, then, is about being self-centered. To think just about oneself and look down on others but speak humbly is hypocrisy, not humility.

However, there are guidelines for speech. It says in Mishlei (27:2): "Others should praise you, but not your mouth." Yet, the gemara (Nedarim 62a) says that in a place where a Torah scholar is not known, he may identify himself as such. When there is another to point out who he is, it is improper to speak about oneself. Tosafot (Kidushin 30a) brings a contradiction. Bava Metzia 23b says that one can/should lie rather than tell how much Torah he has learned. Kidushin 30a says that when one is asked a question, he should answer with confidence, not hesitantly. This implies that he should show his greatness in Torah. Tosafot answers that when there is no purpose for the counterpart to know of his scholarship, he should hide it. When others should know that one is a talmid chacham, he should let it be known. If one is lucky, he will not have to say so himself, which is uncomfortable for one with internal humility. If he needs to, he should find the appropriate way to let out the information.

Using a resume and a confident (not haughty) presentation of one's accomplishments and qualifications is appropriate to secure a job. (It is better to hint or cite facts than to make a self- appraisal.) A rabbi must ensure that his class or congregation knows it can rely on his expertise. An institution that needs money to continue its work has an obligation to its projects and dependents to convince potential donors that it is a wise philanthropic choice. If they do so too openly, they will be viewed as lacking anava. If they do not feel uncomfortable doing so, they may have lost their internal anava. So "show what you've got," as necessary, now and in the future, and continue to feel uncomfortable about it.

Ask the Rabbi Q&A is part of Hemdat Yamim, the weekly parsha sheet published by Eretz Hemdah. You can read this section or the entire Hemdat Yamim at www.ou.org or www.eretzhemdah.org. And/or you can receive Hemdat Yamim by email weekly, by sending an email to info@eretzhemdah.org with the message: Subscribe/English (for the English version) or Subscribe/Hebrew (for the hebrew version). Please leave the subject blank. Ask the Vebbe Rebbe is partially funded by the Jewish Agency for Israel

[2] Candle by Day

Some consciously shun inspirational experiences in order not to burden their mediocrity.
From "A Candle by Day" by Rabbi Shraga Silverstein
A Candle by Day • The Antidote • The World Of Chazal by Rabbi Shraga Silverstein
Now available at 054-209-9200

[3] CHIZUK and IDUD (for Olim & not-yet-Olim respectively)

The Talmud (B'rachot 4a) questions why Moshe told Par'o that the death of the first-borns would take place "kachatzot halaila" - at about midnight - rather than the exact time of midnight. Surely, Moshe could have been accurate to the nanosecond. The answer: Perhaps Par'o's wise men would make a mistake in their reckoning of the time and then say: "Moshe is a liar."

This interpretation would seem to fly in the face of all reasonable thought. After all, Moshe had correctly predicted nine terrible and unusual events that had literally plagued the Egyptian people. He then predicted the most terrible of all - the death of Egypt's first-borns. Imagine that he had said that this would take place exactly at midnight. Let's assume that the palace clocks were inaccurate and according to their time all the first- borns died at midnight plus twenty seconds. What is the response of Egypt's best and brightest? "You see how Moshe is nothing but a liar."

The level of self deception and refusal to face facts is so mind boggling that we might well wonder at the sanity of such wise men or, alternatively, at what the Tamudic sages were trying to tell us in this seemingly odd interpretation.

Perhaps the lesson to be drawn from this discussion is that the Rabbis profoundly understood the true nature of man and the depths of his psyche:

1) We don't like to face unpleasant truths.
2) The power of rationalization to substitute good reasons for real reasons is boundless.
3) Man will grab at the thinnest of straws to deny the reality which stares him in the face.

Should we be surprised by the ancient Egyptian think tank's reaction? After all, modern Jewish history has seen its Egypts and their wise men, perhaps those Ph.D.s who met at Wansee or commanded Einsatzgruppen. It has witnessed the birth of a Jewish State in which Jews no longer have to live under non- Jewish rule, in which Torah flourishes, and in which we are called to help shape our destiny.

Is it possible there are yet those wise and many who are more than wise who are still waiting because they think that this great drama of Reishit Tzemichat Geulateinu is but an illusion? Do their sojourns in the Egypts of Jewish History continue because the details of the Reishit do not meet their redemption clocks?
May it be that those who dwell in Goshen's darkness see a great light.
Moshe EMET - it is we who may miss the mark.
Rabbi David Ebner, PhD, Jerusalem
TORAH THOUGHTS as contributed by Aloh Naaleh members for publication in the Orthodox Union's 'Torah Insights', a weekly Torah publication on Parshat Ha'Shavuah

[4] A Touch of Wisdom, A Touch of Wit

In Kovno, as in many other cities, there was a special building known as HEKDESH, a community-owned building where the poor could sleep. But it had fallen into a terrible state of disrepair. It was damp, and the poor had to spend the night in filth. No one, though, seemed to care, for the community had many other demands on it.

R' Yisrael Salanter found out about this. One night, he went to the HEKDESH, lay down on the ground, and slept there that entire night.

In the morning, they saw that R' Yisrael had spent the night there, and a commotion arose in the city. The community leaders immediately began to repair the building.

R' Zvi Ashkenazi, the Chacham Zvi, would on occasion take out the different letters which he had received from people throughout the world, and would reread the various titles and praises about himself contained in these letters.

"Rebbe," he was asked, "why do you do this?"

"When I read these," replied R' Zvi, "I realize how people regard me, and I resolve to be careful not to sin out of respect for the writers."

Shmuel Himelstein has written a wonderful series for ArtScroll: Words of Wisdom, Words of Wit; A Touch of Wisdom, A Touch of Wit; and "Wisdom and Wit" — available at your local Jewish bookstore (or should be). Excerpted with the permission of the copyright holder

[5] Parsha Points to Ponder - BO

1) The Torah records that on the night of the last plague, NO DOG WAG HIS TONGUE TOWARDS THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL (11:7). What is the significance of this?
2) The Haggadah emphasizes that G-D carried out the plague of Makkat Behorot alone without the aid of any angels. How can this be reconciled with the passuk (12:23) which states that G-D did not let THE DESTROYER enter the homes of the Jews during that night?
3) The emphasizes THIS DAY that we left Egypt three times (12:51, 13:3,4). Why?

THESE ARE THE ANSWERS
Ponder the questions first, then read here

1) Rav Yehuda HaChasid explains that our tradition teaches that dogs bark at a dead bodies because they can perceive the angels and forces involved with the death of a person. The dogs not only bark but they become aggressive and difficult to control. Although Egypt was full of dead bodies and all of these forces of death, G-D changed nature and the dogs remained quiet and unaggressive out of respect for the Jewish people.
2) The Vilna Gaon answers that the DESTROYER here refers to the angel responsible for regular non-plague related deaths. G-D made sure that no Jews died from even natural deaths during that plague to insure that the Egyptians had no opening to suggest that Jews were also subject to this plague.
3) The S'forno teaches that Nissan that year fell in the spring time. G-D and Moshe are telling the Jews of all generations make sure that the Pesach always be similar to that day. They should do so by establishing the necessary leap years. By doing so, every Pesach will be like THIS DAY.

Parsha Points to Ponder is prepared by Rabbi Dov Lipman Mashgiach Ruchani, Yeshivat Yesodei HaTorah in Bet Shemesh, author of "DISCOVER: Answers for Teenagers (and adults) to Questions about the Jewish Faith", soon to be republished by Feldheim - ppp@israelcenter.co.il

[6] Portion for the Portion by Rakel Berenbaum
- FEEDback to berenbau@actcom.net.il
The darkness of Egypt and the light of the Jews

The plagues touched every aspect of the physical world, to show the Egyptians that Hashem alone controls all forces of nature (not that there are many different forces as the Egyptians believed).

In the ninth plague the Egyptians were hit by darkness. Why did Hashem bring this plague?

For one thing, it is very hard to do anything without light. That is why a blind person, who is in the dark all the time, is considered as dead. He is cut off from connection with everything in the world; objects, people, even in some ways himself because he can not see himself. That is why light was the first thing that Hashem created.

The midrash Shmot Rabba relates a practical reason for the darkness. There were some wicked Jews who had become wealthy in Egypt and did not want to leave with their brethren. Hashem brought on the darkness so that He could kill those Jews without the Egyptians noticing. Otherwise the Egyptians would say that the Jews died for the same reason as the Egyptians (and not because they were wicked in their own way).

The Chidushei Harim teaches us a moral lesson from the plague of darkness. He says that the worst type of darkness is when one Jew doesn't want to see the sorrow of his fellow Jew and doesn't lend a helping hand. That's how the Avnei Ezel explains Chazals words that the darkness had the thickness of a gold coin. Running after money increases a person's selfishness and makes it hard for him to see the hardship of others.

The Jewish people did not suffer from any of the plagues. Therefore while the Egyptians were blinded by the thick darkness, the Jews were basking in the light. The Rebbe from Kotzk says that Hashem even let them enjoy the special light, created on the first day of the world, that had been hidden immediately after its creation so wicked people could not benefit from it. In Egypt, since all the wicked people were sitting in the dark, Hashem let out this unique light for the Jews. May we "see" the plight of our brothers and help each other in whatever way we can so we may be worthy of this special light speedily in our day.

DARK & LIGHT COOKIES
Cookie
200 gm. margarine
l cup sugar
2 tsp. vanilla
½ tsp. salt
2 eggs
3 cups flour
Mix margarine and sugar. Add all the dry ingredients. Gradually add eggs.
Make balls and press down one side to flatten. Place on baking sheet at distance of 2 cm.
Bake 15 minutes at 160C.

Icing
Dark (Black)
Ύ cup powdered sugar
4 tbsp. cocoa
2 tbsp. hot water
1½ Tbsp. oil
Light ( white or add food coloring for yellow)
1 cup powdered sugar
Ό tbsp. vanilla
2 Tbsp. hot water
1 Tbsp. oil
1 drop lemon juice
Cover the flat side almost completely with dark icing (for the darkness of the Egyptians) and a tiny area of the flat side with white or yellow icing ( for the light of Israel).

[7] Divrei Menachem

Among the events in Parshat Bo is the command to prepare the Korban Pesach, the Paschal Lamb. On the tenth of the month of Nissan this lamb was to be selected personally by the head of each household, to be tied to his bedpost and to be held in the house for four days, prior to the slaughtering.

The technical reason for withholding the lamb, offered by Rashi, is that the lamb would need to be checked for blemishes, a process that normally takes four days. However, since the Egyptians considered the sheep a deity, the rabbis note that the tethering of the lambs was designed to induce their curiosity, if not their anger at their (former) slaves. Miraculously, the Egyptians not only refrained from reprisals, they allowed the Jews to leave with their silver and gold utensils appropriated during the plague of darkness.

A Chassidic interpretation of this 4-day delay stresses the self-sacrifice made by the individual, in the light of what could have been a disastrous act on the part of the Jewish householder. Moreover, the goal was to take an object of extreme idol worship - with which the Jews were highly accustomed - and to transform it gradually into an object of holiness.

In the natural course of events, eating turns food into the very essence of the individual, to blood that is associated with the Nefesh or soul. Thus, it is not surprising that, in that fashion, the consumption of the Korban Pesach in those ancient times marked the beginning of the spiritual journey of Bnei Yisrael, characterized by sacrifice, in every sense of the word.

Shabbat Shalom, Menachem Persoff


[The Parshat Bo Homepage]
[The TORAH tidbits Homepage] [How to use TORAH tidbits]
[About The OU/NCSY Israel Center] [About TORAH tidbits]
[www.ou.org]

The Torah Tidbits Archive