Q: Could you please explain how to handle the transition from Shabbat into Tish'a B'Av (which falls on Motza'ei Shabbat) regarding Seuda Shlishit, Havdalah and changing clothes? A: Seuda Shlishit: The b'raita cited in Ta'anit 29a says that one may eat as extravagant a meal as he wants on Shabbat. The Tur (Orach Chayim 552) brings minhagim that one is allowed and would do best to curtail the Shabbat meal. This is especially so at Seuda Shlishit, which is, in effect, the Seuda HaMafseket (the last meal before Tish'a B'Av, which usually - when on a weekday - has special elements of mourning). However, these considerations are countered by the need to avoid displaying mourning on Shabbat. Therefore, there are no real restrictions, even at Seuda Shlishit (Shulchan Aruch 552:10). However, the mood should somewhat reflect the coming of Tish'a B'Av, as long as it does not bring on clearly noticeable changes (Mishna Berura 552:23). One important halachic requirement is that one must finish eating before sunset (Rama, ad loc.). Havdala: One says Havdala in davening or separately in the declaration of "Baruch HaMavdil bein Kodesh L'Chol…" which enables him to do actions that are forbidden on Shabbat. Havdala over a cup of wine is done after Tish'a B'Av (Shulchan Aruch OC 556:1). If one forgot to mention Havdala in Shemoneh Esrei, he does not repeat Shemoneh Esrei even though he is not making Havdala over wine until the next day. Rather, he makes the declaration of Baruch HaMavdil (Mishna Berura 556:2). Unlike Havdala during the Nine Days, where we try to give the wine to a child (Rama 551:10), after Tish'a B'Av an adult can freely drink the Havdala wine (Mishna Berura 556:3). The beracha on besamim (spices) is not said this week. On Tish'a B'Av it is not appropriate, because it is a reviving pleasure, and the havdala- besamim beracha is only on Motza'ei Shabbat. The beracha on the fire is specific to Motza'ei Shabbat, is not a pleasure, and does not require a cup. Therefore, the minhag regarding that b'racha is to say it in shul after davening, before the reading of Eicha (Mishna Berura 556:1). There are those who say that a woman should, in general, avoid making Havdala. This is because of the doubt whether a woman is obligated in the beracha on the fire, which is not directly related to Shabbat and thus is a regular time-related mitzva, from which women are exempt (Biur Halacha 296:8). There- fore, if one's wife will not be in shul at the time of the b'racha, it is better for the husband not to fulfill the mitzva at that time, but to make the b'racha on fire either before or after for himself and his wife (Shemirat Shabbat K'hilchata 62:(98)). Taking off shoes: As we mentioned, one may not do a noticeable act of mourning before Shabbat is over. While finishing to eat before sunset or refraining from washing need not be noticeable, taking off shoes is. There are two minhagim as to when to take them off: 1) One waits until after Shabbat is out, says "Hamavdil" and then change clothes and goes to shul. One can do so a little earlier than the regular time listed for Shabbat being out, which is usually delayed a little bit beyond nightfall to allow for a significant adding on to Shabbat at its end. The exact time is not clear and depends on the latitude of one's location. It is advisable to start Maariv a little late in order to allow people to do so and make it to shul, unless the rabbi has ruled that everyone should take the following approach (ibid.:40; Torat Hamoadim 9:1). 2) One takes off his shoes after "Borchu" of Ma'ariv. One who takes the second approach should bring non-leather footwear and Eicha/Kinot to shul before Shabbat to avoid the problem of hachana (preparations on Shabbat for after Shabbat). However, if one uses these seforim somewhat in shul before Shabbat is out, he can bring them with him on Shabbat (Shemirat Shabbat K'hilchata ibid.:41). Ask the Rabbi Q&A is part of Hemdat Yamim,
the weekly parsha sheet published by Eretz Hemdah. You can read this
section or the entire Hemdat Yamim at
www.ou.org or
www.eretzhemdah.org. And/or you can receive Hemdat Yamim by
email weekly, by sending an email to
info@eretzhemdah.org with
the message: Subscribe/English (for the English version) or
Subscribe/Hebrew (for the hebrew version). Please leave the subject
blank. Ask the Vebbe Rebbe is partially funded by the Jewish Agency
for Israel It was only because of the sin of the spies that Eretz Israel could only be conquered through war. Had the Jewish people firmly believed that the Land of Israel was theirs, there would have been no need to engage in battle. The spies sinned in that they weren't sure that Israel was for them. They wanted to check it out first. The Canaanite peoples intuitively sensed this lack of attachment to the Land as an invitation to wage war against us and dispute our Divine inheritance. Had the Jewish people been absolute in their conviction that Israel belongs only to the Jews, than no one on Earth would have dared to dispute our claim to the land. Our rabbi's teach that this very lack of conviction and certainty that Eretz Israel belongs to the Jewish people was the underlying cause for the destruction and exile, and all of the calamities that came in their wake (Ta'anit 29b). To our great dismay, this same lack of
conviction regarding our rights to Israel exists to this very day,
both in the Land of Israel and the Diaspora alike. Rabbi David Samson, Jerusalem Inter alia, Moshe reminds the people of their quest to send spies to search out the Land. Here, Moshe's choice of words is extremely instructive. He recalls that, "You did not wish to ascend [to Eretz Yisrael… for you] said, 'Because of Hashem's hatred for us, he took us out of Egypt… to destroy us'" (D'varim 1:26-27). For a people who experienced the Exodus and Revelation first-hand and for whom miracles were a daily fare, this proclamation was nothing short of insidious. Rashi notes that this brazenly false charge reflects the subjective - but non-existent - animosity that we often feel emanating from a person to whom we personally bear ill will. Bnei Yisrael so talked themselves into this negative state that they claimed that G-d, who could have expelled the Egyptians and left them the fertile Nile Delta, preferred to drive his hated people through the parched desert. Why, we ask, is it so easy to fly in the
face of fact? Why is it so easy to identify with the aggressor? Why
is it so simple to turn truth around? And why to this day do we
still witness such distortions? [The Parshat D'varim Homepage]
|