Lesson # 222 (part two) •Spying an Object deliberately placed Last week's lesson began with the topics of not picking up an object deliberately left by its owner (and, thus, not really a lost object), the classes of deliberately placed objects, and objects found in a rubbish heap. This lesson discusses the finding of objects in a wall, in a store, in a bank, and finding fruit along side an orchard. Finding objects in a wall: If the object filled the hole in the wall from the inside edge to the outside edge where it cannot be ascertained from which side in the wall the object was placed, the owner of the property and the finder divide the object. If it appears, however, that the object was placed there from the inside, the entire object belongs to the owner. On the other hand, if the object appears placed from the outside, it belongs to the finder. A knife, for example, may be assumed to be placed in the hole with the handle outward, while a purse would be placed in the hole with the straps outward. If the owner admits that the object is a found object, it belongs to the finder no matter where found. Assume that a party wall belonging to two adjoining landowners collapsed. If one of the landowners found an object with no identification mark, he may keep it. Finding money in a store or a bank. The rules discussed in this section may be applicable to any type of modern store, including supermarkets and shopping malls. A store, for example, as described in the Talmud and codes, consists of an open area into which the customer enters and where merchandise is displayed in front of the counter and in the back of the store. At the rear wall sits the proprietor in front of that counter where monetary transactions take place for the acquired merchandise. When a customer finds money in the store, to whom does it belong: the storekeeper or the finder? The codes also discuss situations in which money is found on the floor of a money changing business (also applicable to modern-day banks). Assume that Reuven is the proprietor of a store. Shimon, who may or may not be a customer, enters the store, spies money, and picks it up. If Shimon found the money on or behind the counter or in a place reserved solely for the proprietor of the store, it belongs to the proprietor even if the majority of the customers are gentiles and even if the money has no identification mark. The proprietor obviously lost it and did not abandon hope of recovering it. If Shimon found the money in an area of the store not reserved for the proprietor or his employees, the money belongs to him. Just by lying on the premises, the shopkeeper does not automatically acquire the money because in order to do so the public must be excluded by the owner from entering the property, a place where the proprietor wants customers to enter. If a person enters a money changer's store, an office, or a bank and finds money in a place where only the moneychanger or his employees have access, the money belongs to the money changer or the bank, even if the majority of customers are gentiles. If the customer finds money where he has access, then it belongs to the finder. Finding fruit alongside an orchard At times, the fruit is not or cannot be abandoned by the owner of the orchard. In that case, the fruit still belongs to Reuven, the owner of the tree, and Shimon, the finder, must not pick it up, especially if the orchard is fenced in such a way that the fruit obviously belongs to the owner. The fruit that falls outside the orchard cannot be abandoned by the owner of the orchard if he is an orphaned minor. The subject matter of this lesson is more fully discussed in
Volume VIII Chapter 260 of A Restatement of Rabbinic Civil Law by E. Quint.
Copies of all volumes can be purchased via email:
orders@gefenpublishing.com
and via website:
www.israelbooks.com and at local Judaica bookstores. [The Parshat
Yitro Homepage]
|