[P> X:Y (Z)] and [S> X:Y (Z)] indicate start of a parsha p’tucha or s’tuma respectively. X:Y is Perek:Pasuk of the beginning of the parsha; (Z) is the number of p'sukim in the parsha.
SDT The Torah says that Yitro heard things, came to join the People (to convert to Judaism), and then Moshe proceeds to tell Yitro all that has occurred. Did not the Torah just tell us that he heard things before? Did Moshe just repeat that which Yitro had already heard? Of course, hearing the stories from Moshe Rabeinu directly must certainly be better than catching the reports on CNN. Rabbi Sholom Gold suggests another reason. Our sources say that Yitro came to the People of Israel, not just for a family visit, but to convert to Judaism. If his main incentives for coming were hearing of the wonders of the Exodus, the Splitting of theSea, and Matan Torah, then his interest in converting might be suspect. Moshe tells Yitro ALL that has happened AND all the travail, the problems that had befallen the fledgling nation. About the thirst and the hunger, the uncertainty. Only after hearing of how "tough it is to be a Jew", would Yitro be able to be accepted into the nation by Moshe. And so it was. Yitro knew it all and still wanted to be part of the Jewish People. On those terms, we are willing to accept converts. VAYICHAD YITRO, Yitro was delighted with all of the good that G-d had done for the people of Israel. That’s the “plain” meaning of the word. Rashi mentions another possible meaning of the word – of the skin breaking out in “goosebumps”, perhaps a subconscious feeling of mortification for the downfall of his former colleagues.
(This portion of the sedra definitely seems to have occurred after Matan
Torah, even if you want to say that Yitro's original arrival was before.) In the big picture, we see that Parshat Yitro with the main description of Matan Torah precedes Mishpatim with its mundane, everyday, down-to-earth laws. Yet at the beginning of Yitro, we find this out-of- sequence portion of the Mishpatim idea. And at the end of Mishpatim, we have the rest of the story of Maamad Har Sinai.So which really comes first - the lofty, spiritual dimensions of Judaism, or everyday life. We can (and should) look at it as a package deal. However you look at the first part of the sedra, the story of Yitro seems to be an interruption between the events of the Exodus and the Splitting of the Sea on the one hand, and Matan Torah on the other. Seems. But it isn't an interruption - it is a pre-requisite for Matan Torah. Moshe's view of the judging process, ashe explains to Yitro who asks him what he's doing, is that the people come to him LIDROSH ET HA'ELOKIM, to seek out G-d. Yitro's point is that there is a lack of civility among the disputing individuals which must be handled BEFORE they can pursue Knowledge of G-d. This interlude about civil justice can teach us that goodinterpersonal relations allows us to really benefit from Matan Torah. Similarly, DERECH ERETZ KODMA LATORAH.
Here's another way of looking at the "Yitro intro" to Matan Torah. Perhaps the
Torah is telling us how to relive the experience of Matan Torah in our own
lives. Its suggestion is "be like a convert". Take a fresh view of Jewish
life. Marvel at all the things that G-d has done for Bnei Yisrael. Don't take
things for granted. Approach your Judaism like Yitro
did. Even if you are a Jew by birth, work on being a Jew by choice. G-d put
the dramatic stories of the birth of the nation on hold, to let us take a
close look at someone who doesn't have the Mountain poised above his head.
Matan Torah was the mass conversion of a family-based group thatis attaining
nation- hood. But the individual still counts. This we can learn from Yitro,
the individual.
Moshe sends Yitro off on his journey to Midyan (to convert his family, says Rashi). Notice that the first three Aliyot are all part of a single parsha, the parsha of Yitro (not to be confused with weekly Parshat Yitro). Pull that parsha out of the Torah for a moment (don't worry, we'll put it back), and the next thing we read about is Israel traveling from Refidim towards Sinai. This follows smoothly from the battle with Amalek which took place in Refidim. Sequentially, the removed parsha of the Yitro episode is not missed at all. There- fore, it seems obvious that the Yitro portion is there for its lesson value alone. Which is fine, and is how we understand the EIN SEDER MUKDAM U'M'UCHAR BATORAH phenomenon. The Torahis not just going to put things out of chonological order for no good reason.
A famous point, worth repeating... Today is the first day of the rest of our lives. The words of Torah which we learn and live should never become stale. They should be in our eyes as if TODAY we have received them. We should learn Torah and do mitzvot with the freshness and enthusiasm of a first-time experience. This too fits well with the "Yitro model". The challenge: Be a true Torah Jew all your life, for as many years as G-d gives you, but have an enthusiasm that is more common with converts and Baalei T'shuva. After settling in at the foot of Mount Sinai, Moshe ascends to G-d (whatever that really means) and G-d tells him what he is to say to the women and men (sequence is intentional and based on the analysis of the terms Beit Yaakov and and Bnei Yisrael). A clear connection is made between G-d's having taken us out of Egypt and His taking us to Him as His Chosen People - with the condition that we follow Him and His Torah. It is true that a Jew is a Jew regardless of his keeping the Torah or not, but it is clear that G-d has always demanded of us that we be committed to Torah and Mitzvot in order for our relationship with Him to be mutual and actively positive from both sides.
SDT G-d tells Moshe that the People should "sanctify themselves today AND tomorrow". It is relatively easy to sanctify oneself on the day of the great miraculous events of Matan Torah. The challenge to each of us is to sanctify ourselves on the many tomorrows that follow. The days after the wondrous events, the magnificent spiritual experiences. The days when our lives return to "normal". This is what being Jewish is about. We sanctify the mundane. Therefore, there really is nothing that is mundane for us.
[S> 20:1 (1)] G-d (Elokim) speaks all the following things, saying... [S> 20:2 (5)] What we call the first two commandments (or sayings, statements) are combined in a single parsha of 5 p'sukim. They can be seen as two sides of the same coin. You must believe in G-d; you may not believe in other gods...
Mitzva Watch The second commandment contains several prohibitions related to idolatry. Specifically, not to believe in other gods [26,L1 20:3] (this mitzva includes the prohibition of having no belief - atheism), not making idols [27,L2 20:4], nor bowing to them (even without believing in them) [28,L5 20:5], nor worshiping idols in any manner [29,L6 20:5]. Note that this commandment deals with both the thought and actions of Avoda Zara (idolatry). [S> 20:7 (1)] The third commandment prohibits swearing in vain [30,L62 20:7]. This is defined as (1) swearing to the truth of something that is obviously true and well-known - e.g. that the Sun is hot; (2) to swear in denial of an obvious truth - that the Moon is made of cheese (interestingly, this is not considered alie or a false oath, since everyone knows that the Moon is not made of cheese. Only when the truth of a matter is unknown do we use the term lie and false oath. A vain oath is just as serious as a false one, so this distinction is largely academic, but it emphasizes the seriousness of being flippant in regard to swearing.);(3) to swear to violate the Torah - e.g. that one will eat pork. Such an oath is immediately void since we are considered to have taken a prior oath (at Sinai) to not eat pork. Hence, the oath is in vain and is a disrespectful use of G-d's name; (4) to swear to do something that is impossible - e.g. to stay awake for a full week. The common denominator of these types of vain oaths is that they all "cheapen" the use of G-d's name and threaten the smooth functioning of society which often must rely on the seriousness of a real oath. In addition to actual vain oaths, this prohibition is considered by some authorities to include the saying of a BRACHA L'VATALA, and its partner in sin, a BRACHA SHE-EINO TZ'RICHA. Saying G-d's name in vain is forbidden but is not considered part of this Commandment #3. It falls under one or more other prohibitions. [P> 20:8 (4)] Commandment #4 deals with Shabbat and contains the positive mitzva to remember the Shabbat with Kiddush [31,A155 20:8], and the prohibition of all manner of M'lacha, specific categories of creative activities [32,L320 20:10]. The mitzva of ZACHOR includes Kiddush as Shabbat enters, and Havdala as Shabbat leaves. The prohibitions of M'lacha are divided into 39 categories, each of which contains other related activities, usually with the same goal. E.g., PLANTING is one of the 39 categories; watering, pruning, fertilizing all help the growth of plants and are TOLADOT of PLANTING. [S> 20:12 (1)] The fifth commandment is to honor one's parents [33,A210 20:12]. Grand-parents, in- laws, older (or possibly oldest) brother (maybe sister too), and teachers are included (with differences). Honor of parents is usually considered to refer to that which one does for one's parents, as opposed to reverence (fear) of parents which include that which should not be done because it would be disrespectful. [S> 20:13 (2/11 of a pasuk)] #6 is the prohibition of MURDER [34,L289 20:13], which is considered the antithesis of Belief in G-d, since murder directly negates creation of human being in His image. [S> 20:13 (2/11)] Commandment #7 against ADULTERY [35,L347 20:13] is the prohibition of having relations with a married woman, but as a "chapter heading" it also points to the other forbidden relations. [S> 20:13 (2/11)] #8 is LO TIGNOV [36,L243 20:13], which, as mentioned earlier, is specifically defined as kidnapping, but is also the category header of many mitzvot in the Torah. Maybe they can all be summed up as indicating that the person who violates these kind of mitzvot puts himself above other human beings. It is obvious how this is harmful to society, and to the individual's striving for Kedusha. [S> 20:13 (5/11 of a pasuk)] #9 is the prohibition of "bearing false witness" [37,L285 20:13]. We can see in this mitzva, as well as many others, how important it is to G-d, so to speak, that we be able to function as a society. Both oaths, and to a greater extent, perhaps, testimony, are necessary for the establishment of TRUTH, in the absence of having direct knowledge of the truth ourselves. So much of the dealings between people involves the trust we place in each other's word, especially when backed by an oath, and in the confidence we place in the testimony of witnesses. Without these elements of our interpersonal relationships, we would be incapable of functioning as a society. [S> 20:14 (4/15 of a pasuk)] #10 is the commandment against COVETING [38,L265 20:14] sort of sums things up in that it focuses on the thought process that can lead to all types of sins. Being part of "The Big 10" points to the significance of thoughts in the whole picture, which usually consists of deeds.
This 10th commandment is contained in two parshiyot, the first prohibits
coveting the "house of your fellow", and the second one...
Sh'vi'i - Seventh Aliya - 9 p'sukim - 20:15-23 [S> 20:19 (5)] G-d tells Moshe to remind the People that they heard G-d speak; that they shall make no graven human images (even for art) [39,L4 20:20]; they shall make an altar and offer sacrifices upon it; if the altar be of stone, its stone shall not be cut with metal tools [40,L79 20:22]. Metal implements represent the sword, which shortens life; the Altar represents the lengthening of life. From this rule comes the custom to remove or cover the bread-knife during "benching", since our table is likened to the Altar. (Some authorities say that this minhag applies only during the week, not on Shabbat.) The Altar may not be approached with immodest steps [41,L80 20:23] but rather via its ramp.
Rashi points out that with one of the kohein’s 4 garments being pants, there
really wouldn’t be actual immodesty in walking on steps; nonetheless, it has
the appearance of immodesty and is therefore inappropriate as an approach to
the Mizbei’ach (Altar). Rashi adds that if the Torah showed concern for
inappropriate behavior vis-a-vis stones, how much
more so must we be careful not to treat our fellow human beings, who were
created in the image of G-d, in a deprecating manner.
Another common theme between sedra and haftara is the concept of holiness. In the sedra, G-d tells us that we will be to Him a kingdom of Kohanim and a holy nation. As Rabbi Jacobs points out in his “A Haftara Companion”, it is important to remember the difference between the perfect holiness of the Heavenly angels and the Jews striving towards holiness, without being ever able to achieve perfection. He also points out that smoke is used to hide the Divine Presence from mortal eyes. [The Parshat
Yitro Homepage]
|