Torah tidbits

SHEYIBANEH BEIT HAMIKDASH...
A series of articles on Beit HaMikdash-related topics
by Catriel Sugarman

intended to increase the knowledge, interest, and anticipation of the reader, thereby hastening the realization of our hopes and prayers for the rebuilding of Jerusalem and the Beit HaMikdash.

More on Lishkat HaNezirim (Chamber of Nazirites)
We know the names of three Nezirot (female Nazirites) from Bayit Sheini times; Bernice the sister of King Agrippas (Josephus, Wars II,15:1), Miriam of Palmyra (Nazir 6:11) and Queen Helena of Adiabene. The royal family of Adiabene, a small independent state in northern Mesopotamia, embraced Judaism a few years before the Churban. But the Queen was apparently unaware that, because of the laws of ritual purity enforced by the Sages outside of Eretz Yisrael, her Nezirut was invalid. When she came to Jerusalem, she had to begin anew in accordance with the conditions of her original oath. "It once happened that the son of Queen Helena wentto war and she said, 'If he comes back safely, I will become a Nezira." Her son did return from the war and she did become a Nezira. At the end of seven years she came to Eretz Yisrael and the Sages of Beit Hillel told her that she had to be a Nezira yet another seven years. At the end of the (second) seven years, she became ritually impure and she remained a Nezira a total of 21 years" (Nazir 3:6).

The Mishna describes Nezirim coming from the Golah and finding the Mikdash destroyed. This effectively denied them the opportunity of concluding their vows of Nezirut because of their inability to bring the three required Korbanot. "…Nachum the Mede said to them, 'Would you have become Nezirim if you knew that the BeitHamikdash was destroyed? And they answered 'No'. Then Nachum the Mede absolved them of their oath.

But when the matter came before the Sages, they said to him, 'If any man vowed to be a Nazir before the Beit Hamikdash was destroyed, his Nezirut remains binding, but if he took his vow after the Beit Hamikdash was destroyed,his vow does not remain binding'"(Nazir 5:4). Tif'eret Yisrael (ibid. 18) posited that Golah in this case actually did not mean outside of Eretz Yisrael. "It seems to me that these Nezirim were in reality inhabitants of Eretz Yisrael even though the Mishna specifically said that they came from the Golah. The reason isthat by the time they came up (to Jerusalem to offer their Korbanot), the Beit Hamikdash had already been destroyed and then all Israel wandered around aimlessly here and there just like a deer unable to find pasturage."

Rambam rules, "The laws of Nezirut apply whether or not the Mikdash is standing. Therefore in these times, someone who takes upon himself to become a Nazir, must remain one for life, because there is no Mikdash where he can bring the required (concluding) Korbanot and thereby terminate his period of sworn abstinence. Thelaws of Nezirut apply only in Eretz Yisrael and if someone took upon himself to be a Nazir abroad, he is fined and is forced to relocate to Eretz Yisrael where he must live as a Nazir the same amount of time he originally took upon himself to do abroad" (Hil. Nezirut 2:20,21).

When the Nazir's term of Nezirut was fulfilled, he had to bring three Korbanot; a Chatat (a ewe), an Olah (a male lamb) and Shelamim (a peace offering, a ram), in that order (Hil. Nezirut 8:2). The meat of the Chatat was eaten by the Kohanim in the Azara as part as the atonement process ("The Kohanim eat and the owners- i.e. the Nezirim - obtain atonement" - Pesachim 59b). The Olah was totally burnt upon the Mizbei'ach except for the skin which was given to the Kohanim. Part of the Shelamim was burnt on the Mizbei'ach, a portion was given to the Kohanim, and the rest eaten by the Nazir. Aside from the breast and the thigh which weredue to the Kohanim from all Shelamim, the Kohanim received an extra gift, the upper foreleg. The Shelamim, the "ram of the Nazir", could be eaten on the day of slaughter and the following night until midnight. The Kohanim and the members of their households could eat the Muram (the portion allotted to the Kohanim from the Shelamim) anywhere in Jerusalem if they were in a state of purity (Zevachim 5:7). The Nazir also brought "a basket of unleavened bread; loaves of fine flour mixed with oil and unleavened wafers smeared with oil; and their meal offerings and their libations" (Bamidbar 6:15). Once the Korbanot were offered, the Nazir retired to Lishkat HaNezirim, the chamber to the southeast corner of the Ezrat Nashim (Court of the Women). It was there, "the Nezirim - cooked their Shelamim, cut off their hair and threw (the shavings) under the pot…" (Midot 2:5). The Torah ordains, "…the Nazir shall shave his Nazirite head; he shall take the hair of his consecrated Nazirite head and put it in the fire which is under the (cooking) sacrificial peace offering. The Kohein shall take the cooked upper foreleg of the ram and one unleavened loaf from the basket and one unleavened wafer and place them on the hands of the Nazir after he shaved his consecrated Nazarite head. And the Kohein shall wave them as a wave offering before G-d …and afterwards the Nazir may drink wine" (Bamidbar 6:18-20). He also was now permitted to become ritually impure (though not in the Mikdash) and cut his hair normally. Strictly speaking, the meat of the "ram of the Nazir" could be "cooked in any fashion and could be eaten anywhere within the city of Jerusalem" (Zevachim 5:7), so why was a special chamber in the Ezrat Nashim set aside for this purpose? Tif'eret Yisrael comments that "many Nezirim were from other cities and did not have acquaintances in Jerusalem (where they might have felt at home enough to cook sacrificial meat). Therefore (as a courtesy), the spacious chamber in the southeastern corner of the Ezrat Nashim (40 amot by 40 amot square), was placed at their disposal for them to cook and eat the meat of their Shelamim if they chose to do so (ibid. T.Y. 47 end). There must have been a relatively large number of Nezirim in BayitSheini days to warrant the setting aside of such valuable space for this purpose.

QUESTION: In TT of Feb. 6-7, you mentioned the "Megilat Esther" as an "important commentary on the Sefer HaMitzvot of the Rambam." Was the "Megillat Esther" perchance a woman?

ANSWER: No, the "Megilat Esther" a.k.a. HaRav Yitzchak DeLeon was not a woman. This commentator, in his introduction to his word on Sefer HaMitzvot writes, "I named my book… Megilat Esther, so I will be reminded all my life of my affliction and sorrow of the passing of my righteous and learned mother, the gracious lady Esther, may her soul rest in Eden." May her memory be a blessing.

Catriel is in the process of writing a book: The Temple of Jerusalem, A Pilgrims Prospective; A Guided Tour through the Temple and the Divine Service


[The Parshat Ki-Tisa Homepage]
[The TORAH tidbits Homepage] [How to use TORAH tidbits]
[About The OU/NCSY Israel Center] [About TORAH tidbits]
 
[www.ou.org]
 

The Torah Tidbits Archive