Q Someone sinned against his friend, but the victim is unaware of what the sinner did to him and will be very upset if he finds out. Should the sinner tell him and ask for forgiveness? A The mishna (Yoma 85b) says that one does not receive atonement on Yom Kippur for sins between man and man until he appeases the victim. Thus, the sinner should go to great lengths to appease. The question is whether that includes causing further pain to the victim. This dilemma is said to be a point of disagreement between two of the great teachers of morality of a century ago. The Chafetz Chayim, in the work from which he received his nickname (Hilchot Lashon Hara 4:12) states that one who caused damage to his friend through speech must ask his forgiveness even if it requires uncovering the story. Rav Yisrael Salanter is reported (in both oral and written record of the exchange) to have protested the ruling, claiming that a sinner cannot make efforts to receive atonement at the expense of another, who doesn't deserve more pain. Rav Avigdor Neventzal shlita is cited (Mikraei Kodesh (Harari) Yom Kippur 2:(4)) as finding it difficult to believe that the Chafetz Chayim is understood correctly. Rav Neventzal understood that it would be proper to uncover the offense only if the resulting damage would be to the sinner, not if it would extend to the victim. Whatever version of the Chafetz Chayim's opinion (or Rabbeinu Yona's, upon whom it is based) one accepts, the accepted approach is that it is wrong to cause new wounds. One should also realize that even if he gets a degree of atonement for the sin (asking forgiveness of man or Hashem does not assure full removal of every sin), he may add on to the grievousness of the damage and, thus, might anyway lose out in the process. This being said, one must realize that sometimes the aforementioned concern is exaggerated. On one hand, there are times that even if a victim is aware of the affront, recalling it will cause a painful re-opening of the wound. Yet, that does not mean that it is not worthwhile to ask forgiveness. Often wounds need to be re-opened in order to be properly tended to and heal. The offender should not automatically use the initial uneasiness as an excuse to avoid the very difficult task of asking forgiveness. However, one has to be wise and sensitive about how he does it. If he makes a quick phone call a half hour before Yom Kippur or the like it might be taken as an insincere effort to get some overly easy atonement. Emotional conversations must be planned, and no two situations are identical or are properly remedied in the identical way. What happens if one decides that he should not ask forgiveness? First of all, a general request of forgiveness from the party is worth something, certainly when the affront is known but is embarrassing to the victim to bring up (see Mishna Berura (written by the Chafetz Chayim) 606:4, who agrees in this case). In general, it appears that the mishna that requires appeasing the victim is some- times taken out of context. Yes, it is futile to attempt teshuva for sins between people by addressing only Hashem without receiving forgiveness from his friend. But it can be illustrated from the mishna's context and from related sources that this is because one cannot be sincere about his repentance if he has the ability to remedy the situation and refuses to do so. So, Rambam (Teshuva 2:9) talks in one breath of making necessary monetary payments and appeasing. The Pri Chadash (OC 606) and Minchat Chinuch (#364) talk about not getting atonement even for the element of the sin of affront to Hashem in this case. There is also a process described as sufficient to do one's duties of seeking forgiveness from victims who are not willing to forgive. These and other sources imply that if one does all that he should for his counterpart, then Hashem will grant him at least partial atonement. Thus, if one refrains from revealing details only in order to spare his friend pain (as Rav Salanter requires) he can expect to receive partial atonement, according to his sincerity. Ask the Rabbi Q&A is part of Hemdat
Yamim, the weekly parsha sheet published by Eretz Hemdah. You can read
this section or the entire Hemdat Yamim at www.ou.org or
www.eretzhemdah.org. And/or you can receive Hemdat Yamim by email weekly,
by sending an email to eretzhem@netvision.net.il with the message: Join
Hemdatya –Please leave the subject blank. Ask the Vebbe Rebbe is partially
funded by the Jewish Agency for Israel If you’ve enjoyed these stories, look
for Shmuel Himelstein's new book, "Wisdom and Wit", at your local Jewish
bookstore - an entirely new collection. And, we'll bet you think the Hebrew
word for perforation is PERFORATZIYA. Not even close. The correct Hebrew
word for perforation is NIKBUV. Same root but different from the word
NIKUV, which means to make a single hole or a few holes. A stamp is
perforated (M'NUKBAV) so the tab can be neatly removed. The first to insist on burial in the Land of Israel was our forefather, Jacob. Jacob wished to be buried in Eretz Israel, not only for the personal spiritual benefit that he would derive, but also for a much more profound reason. The Meshech Chochma argues that Jacob wished to prevent the assimilation of his offspring into Egyptian life and culture. Jacob impressed the centrality of Eretz Yisrael upon the national psyche of his descendants. Many Jews throughout the generations, who were unable to come to Israel during their lifetimes, echoed Jacob's sentiments and instructed that they be buried there. They too wanted to impress upon their own families and communities that they are but tempo- rary dwellers in a foreign land. In Midrash Mishlei, Rabbi Levi's version of the drasha regarding V'CHIPER ADMATO AMO reads in a slightly different manner. He says that anyone who lives in Eretz Yisrael, even for a single hour, and dies there, is destined to inherit the world to come. According to Rabbi Levi, burial alone does not do the trick; living in the land is essential. The Talmud relates Rabbi Elazar's reaction to the death of Ulla, his student, outside of Eretz Yisrael: "You, Ulla, should die in an unclean land!" Hearing that Ulla's coffin had arrived, Rabbi Elazar declared: "Receiving a man in his lifetime is not the same as receiving him after his death." Jacob was unable to return to live in Israel, but his descendants living in our present, unique times, are welcome to return. May we all merit to live long lives in the Land of Israel. Rabbi Yitzchak Korn, Jerusalem Consider next that the greatest form of
T'shuva for the Jewish people is to return to live in Eretz Yisrael. Rashi
(Vayikra 25:38), based on the midrash, explains to us that living outside
of Israel is tantamount to idol worship. Ohr HaChaim HaKadosh (D'varim
30:20) then explains, that when Moshe tells us "to dwell (la'shevet) on
the land which Hashem promised to your fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob
to give to them," it means that to dwell in Eretz Yisrael is the pathway
to the attainment of wholeness and completion, a "lengthening of days",
and that, as it is written, it is a commandment equal to all of Torah. It
is no coincidence that the word for 'to dwell' and 'to return' have the
same root, as to do T'shuva is also to be grounded, physically,
emotionally and spiritually. Rav Mordechai Attia explains (Lech Lecha
V'Sod HaShvuah, pg. 67) that the word T'shuva itself, made up of the
Hebrew word "shuv" (return) followed by the letter "heh" (the sfira
malchut), means, to return to the Land of Israel. In the book "Kedushat
Ha'Aretz", pg. 7, (The Holiness of the Land), we learn that the person who
lives in Israel is surrounded by holiness from all sides, "above and
below, from the outside and from the inside. From below, standing on holy
ground. From above, heaven's gates open opposite Eretz Yisrael". The Zohar
explains that the passage that we read every Shabbat in the Mincha
service, "You are one, and Your name is one, one nation in the land" means
that Hashem's Holy Name, the Tetragrammaton, occurs only when the People
of Israel reside in the Land of Israel. This union of the nation and the
land lead to a greater spiritual energy flow from heaven to earth, with
the nation as the conduit. As Rav Zvi Yehuda Kook (Sichot Zvi Yehuda, Vayikra, pg 57) commented on the passage "the air of Eretz Yisrael makes wise", that it "also heals." "And I will throw upon you pure waters" (Ezekiel 36:25) refers to this spiritual cleansing after our return to the land. Eretz Yisrael, acting as a "healing medicine, and medical bath", which acts to remove sickness from inside to the outside, prior to a complete healing, will "initially remove the inner spiritual poisons to the outside" of those who come to dwell there" (Lech Lecha, V'Sod HaShvuah, pg. 42-45). Rav Mordechai Attia, thus explains the meaning of the Spies report, that all those entering the land "fall in their stature", due to a cleansing, prior to an eventual elevation. This process does not occur all at once, as our healing crisis would be too much for our individual and collective strength. As Maimonides wrote (Hanhagah Habriut, Ch. 2) that if the medicine is stronger than the patient intrinsic strength, he will succumb. The prophet Isaiah (52:12) tells us, "Not in a hurry, you will go out" from the exile to the future redemption, in contrast to the redemption from Egypt. Rav Kook (Ma'amrei Hariya, Pesach of Egypt, Pesach of the Future, pg 164) explains that the slow redemption functions to allow us to remove all of the "foreign influences" of 2000 years of exile from our national contiousness in a slow manner, as our abilities to perceive and integrate the great light of the redemption have been too dampened to receive it all at once. The last few decades have shown an increasing expression of angst, fear, despair and anger amongst the people living within the land. Not only has this been due to an unclear sense of self-purpose and destiny, I maintain that this has also been due to the continuing cleansing process of our exilic sickness, of 2000 years of fear, angst, despair and anger. The present crisis, internal (economic, social, religious) and external (terrorist war), only increased the tempo of the healing. As I routinely see in my practice, most people only return to health once they've reached the crisis of sickness. Our crisis has forced us to return to reclarify our purpose here in Eretz Yisrael, to be healthy in body, mind and spirit, as a light unto the nations. The darkness always precedes the light, the contrast making the light all that much brighter. I can already see the light, and it shines stronger every day. May the present tshuvah season bring you closer to the path of light. Article by Yehuda Ben-Asher, M.D., from
his bimonthly newsletter, The Natural Path. Dr. Ben-Asher has a Jerusalem
practice in Naturopathic Medicine. 993-3446 The rabbis discuss whether the stumbling is the result of our iniquity or the iniquity itself constitutes the stumbling. Ibn Ezra deduces that the latter approach is correct, for Hashem tells us later (v.5) that He will heal our backsliding. Like the proficient doctor, G-d will attend to both the sickness of the body and the wounds. Of course, when we ask ourselves into what iniquity we have stumbled, the list grows exponentially. Nehama Leibowitz considers several sources implying that our mistake was to seek out deviant sources of salvation - political alliances and hand-made idols, for example. Ultimately, she concludes that our most grievous sin was (is) the faith that we put in ourselves. We are overwhelmed by this realization.
And in our naïve way we call out, "Our Father, our King, return us to You
in perfect repentance." However, what Shabbat Shuva is really about is our
taking the first step. We need first to return. Then, it seems, Hashem
will assist us. [The Parshat Ha'azinu Homepage]
|