Numbers in [square brackets] are the mitzva-count of the Sefer HaChinuch
Kohen - First Aliya - 13 p'sukim - 28:10-22 [SDT] There are different explanations concerning the
wording of this pasuk. As to why the Torah mentions Yaakov's departure,
Rashi explains that a prominent person not only influences his surround-
ings, but his absence from a place is also felt, in a negative way.
Therefore, the Torah not only tells us that Yaakov went to Haran; it also
tells us that he left Be'er Sheva, and his absence was felt - even though
Yitzchak (and Rivka) remained there. (Perhaps, especially because Yitzchak
and Rivka remained in Be’er Sheva - they would feel Yaakov’s absence the
most!) He encounters "The Place" (it is unidentified in the text, but is traditionally considered to be Har Moriah, the site of the Akeida, and the location of the future Beit HaMikdash) and stays the night. He dreams of a ladder with its feet planted in the ground and whose top reaches the heavens. Angels are ascending and descendingthe ladder. [SDT] The S'fat Emet points out that the ladder in Yaakov's dream is described first as having its feet planted on the ground (representing worldliness and/or basic decency) and then its head reaching the heavens (representing spiritual pursuits). This is consistent with the famous maxim from Pirkei Avot - Derech Eretz Kodma laTorah,worldliness precedes Torah. [SDT] This represents the "Changing of the Guard". Angels that accompanied Yaakov in Eretz Yisrael are not the same as those outside Israel, just as Shabbat angels differ from those of weekdays. Our weekly counterpart to Yaakov's dream is the Friday night song, Shalom Aleichem, which refers to the changing of the angels. [SDT] Commentaries point out that G-d was "standing watch" over Yaakov because there was a gap between the ascension of the angels and the descending of the new ones - OLIM (and then) V'YORDIM BO. (Note the difference with our Friday night: We first welcome the Shabbat angels with BO’I V’SHALOM, come in peace, and then we say farewell to the weekday angels with TZEITCHEM L’SHALOM. [SDT] A person should realize that wealth is not permanent; it can be lost as easily as it is gained. Therefore, if one is blessed with wealth, he should use it wisely, constructively, charitably. This idea is symbolized by the ladder, and the ups and downs that take place on it - the SULAM, with the angels OLIM V'YORDIM BO. SULAM (ladder) is numerically 60+6+30+40=136. MAMON (money) is also 40+40+6+50=136. And so is ONI (poverty) 70+6+50+10=136. More... KOL, voice (prayer) and TZOM, fasting are also equal to 136, perhaps saying that prayer and petition of G-d can be effective in resulting in a blessing of wealth rather than one's being poor. In the dream, G-d appears to Yaakov from the head of the
ladder and reiterates to him the promises made to Avraham and Yitzchak.
These oft- repeated promises have consistently included the possession of
the Land and the "countless" nature of their descendants. This prophecy also
includes G-d's promise of protection for Yaakov on his sojourn. Yaakov
awakens from his sleep and acknowledges the sanctity of the place. When
Yaakov awakens in the morning, he takes the stone (formerly referred to in
the plural) that was at his head, and erects it as a monument which he then
anoints. He names the place Beit El. Yaakov vows allegiance to G-d. [SDT] "And I will return to my father's home and HaShem will be for me G-d." The Ramban explains the connection between Yaakov's return home with his "acquisition of G-d". The Gemara in Ketuvot states that he who lives in Eretz Yisrael is like one who has G-d; he who lives outside Israel is like one without G-d. Yaakov's return from Lavan's house to his father's was a physical as well as spiritual Aliya - as is Aliya to Eretz Yisrael in our own time.
When they tell him that they work for Lavan, Yaakov asks about his well-being. The shepherds point out the approaching Rachel, daughter of Lavan. They explain to Yaakov that they must cooperate with each other in order to physically remove the stone from the well. Just then, Yaakov sees Rachel, his cousin, and approaches the rock and single-handedly removes it from the mouth of the well in order to give drink to the sheep of his uncle. Yaakov kisses Rachel and weeps bitterly. (He weeps because he sees with Ru'ach HaKodesh that they are destined not to be buried together.) Yaakov tells Rachel who he is - what their relationship is - and she runs off to tell her father. When Lavan hears, he runs out to welcome Yaakov, and brings him home to tell "the whole story". Lavan "offers" Yaakov a job and tells him "to name his price". Lavan had two daughters - Leah, the older one and Rachel, the younger one. Leah had "weak" (sensitive) eyes and Rachel was very beautiful.
Lavan gathers the locals for the festivities and substitutes Leah for Rachel. [SDT] Sources indicate that it was Rachel who facilitated the switch, motivated by love and compassion for her sister. Rachel gave her private "signals" to Leah to save her from a probable marriage to Eisav, Yitzchak's biological elder. This com- passion serves her descendants well many years later, when she "intercedes" before G-d following the destruction of the Beit HaMikdash. Tradition tells us that G-d "softened" the punishment with a promise of return, only after Rachel pleaded before Him. The Avot and Moshe had not succeeded in their pleas on behalf of the people. When Yaakov confronts Lavan about the deceit, Lavan says that it is improper to marry off the younger before the older. (this is the minhag in many communities, despite the fact that its origin is Lavan.) Yaakov agrees to work an additional seven years for Rachel. Zilpa and Bilha are the handmaidens of Leah and Rachel respectively (commentaries say they too were daughters of Lavan, from a pilegesh). Yaakov showed his obviously greater love of Rachel. As a result, G-d made Leah fertile and Rachel barren. Next the Torah tells us, in rapid succession, of the births of Reuven, Shimon, Levi, and Yehuda. Leah names each son (Levi was named by Yaakov or perhaps by an angel) with a name that expresses her thanks to G-d and her feelings under the unusual circum- stances of her life. Rachel, jealous of Leah, complains to Yaakov that she has no children. Yaakov gets angry with her, saying that it is G-d's doing, not his. Rachel gives Bilha to Yaakov to have children whom she will raise as her own. Dan and Naftali are born. Leah, realizing that she has stopped having children, gives Zilpa to Yaakov. Gad and Asher are the results. [SDT] Notice the rapid fashion the Torah employs to tell us
of the build-up of Yaakov's family. With Avraham and Yitzchak having such a
difficult time fathering children, Yaakov has fathered 10 sons in the span
of 16 p'sukim! After Yosef is born, Yaakov asks his leave of Lavan. He desires to return to his fathers' home. He asks for his wives, children, and compensation for all the work he has done for Lavan. Lavan acknowledges that he has been blessed because of Yaakov.
Lavan's sons feel as if Yaakov has cheated their father. G-d tells Yaakov to return to his birthplace. Yaakov calls to his wives and explains the situation to them. He tells them of being instructed by an angel as to what to do with the animals. Rachel and Leah feel as strangers in their father's house and are prepared to do as G-d commands.
Rav Aryeh Kaplan z”l in The Living Torah, expains Terafim according to different opinions. Some say they were idols that were worshiped. This opinion adds that Rachel took them to save her father from the sin of idolatry. Others are of the opinion that they were meditative devices that would enable Lavan to divine the whereabouts of Yaakov. Thus Rachel’s motive was to prevent Lavan from pursuing Yaakov and family. Yaakov answers in kind, expressing his anger at Lavan's repeated attempts to cheat him. As to the terafim, Yaakov permits Lavan to search for them and boldly declares that the one who took them shall not live. Lavan fails to find his terafim because Rachel convinces him not to search her person or belongings. Had it not been for G-d's protection, Yaakov tells Lavan, you would have left me with nothing. KI VARACH... The Midrash, based on the same phrase being used, says that it was Amalek who told Lavan that Yaakov fled, and later told Par'o that Bnei Yisrael did so too.
Yaakov continues on his journey and encounters angels (of Eretz Yisrael - the sedra thus comes full circle) on the way, Yaakov names the place Machanayim. The last 3 p'sukim are reread for the Maftir. Haftara - 28* p'sukim -Hoshe’a 12:13-14:10 * Some suggest concluding the haftara with Yoel 2:26-27, in order to end the haftara on a better note than Hoshea ends with. This concluding portion of the book(let) of Hoshea begins with reference to Yaakov's journey to Aram to find (and work on behalf of) a wife (wives) - hence its obvious connection to the sedra. The prophet points out to the People of Israel their humble origins, in an attempt to put things in perspective and restore their faith and reliance upon G-d. This haftara contains SHUVA YISRAEL... from the haftara of Shabbat Shuva. The last pasuk in Hoshea states: Whoever is wise, let him
understand this... The ways of G-d are straight, and the righteous will walk
on them and the wicked will stumble. The Gemara explains this pasuk with the
example of two people who eat Korban Pesach, one eats it AL HA'SOVA, while
satisfied but not stuffed, and the other eats K.P.but he is full from his
Seder meal. Amazing that the Gemara illustrates this pasuk with two people,
both of whom fulfill mitzvot. The POSHEI'A is mitzva- observant! He buys a
lamb, brings it as a K.P., roasts it properly - everything. Except the one
little detail of AL HA'SOVA. And that brands him a sinner. There is a
message in the Gemara's choice of example. A person who doesn't keep mitzvot
usually knows he's not doing the right thing, but doesn't care. Let's call
him a "gross poshei'a". The one referred to in the Gemara is the "subtle
sinner". Seems so insignificant. Especially compared with others. But the
proper way to eat K.P. requires the additional effort throughout the Seder
meal to control one’s appetite. The additional Mussar- message cannot be
overlooked. By choosing these examples to illustrate those who walk upright on G-d's path and those who stumble, we are to understand that a "regular" sinner will obviously stumble on the G-d's path. But the message is more subtle than that. Even a person engrossed in Torah and Mitzvot will occasionally stumble. Food for thought. Particularly appropriate in light of the fact that the Haftara speaks about T'shuva. [The
Parshat Vayeitzei Homepage]
|