Parashat Yitro
Kohen - First Aliya - 12 p'sukim - 18:1-12 [SDT] The straight reading of this portion indicates that Yitro heard about the Crossing of the Sea and of the battle with Amalek. These are the events recorded in the previous sedra. Other commentaries point to certain textual references about Sinai and are of the opinion that Yitro came after Matan Torah, sometime during the almost one year that the People remained camped near Mt. Sinai. If the latter opinion is correct, then we have an example of "there is no set order in the Torah's account of what happen(ed/s)". And we can add the events of Sinai revelation to the list of what Yitro "heard and came". [SDT] The Torah says that Yitro heard things, came to join the People (to convert to Judaism), and then Moshe proceeds to tell Yitro all that has occurred. Did not the Torah just tell us that he heard things before? Did Moshe just repeat that which Yitro had already heard? Of course, hearing the stories from Moshe Rabeinu directly must certainly be better than catching the reports on CNN. Rabbi Sholom Gold suggests another reason. Our sources say that Yitro came to the People of Israel, not just for a family visit, but to convert to Judaism. If his main incentives for coming were hearing of the wonders of the Exodus, the Splitting of the Sea, and Matan Torah, then his interest in converting might be suspect. Moshe tells Yitro ALL that has happened AND all the travail, the problems that had befallen the fledgling nation. About the thirst and the hunger, the uncertainty. Only after hearing of how "tough it is to be a Jew", would Yitro be able to be accepted into the nation by Moshe. And so it was. Yitro knew it all and still wanted to be part of the Jewish People. On those terms, we are willing to accept converts. [SDT] Yitro's reaction upon hearing all that Moshe has told him is to say BARUCH HASHEM. The Gemara in Brachot says that we derive the obligation to say a bracha for a miracle from Yitro. The Gemara in Sanhedrin says that it is not a compliment to Moshe and the multitude who came out of Egypt, that they did not say Baruch HaShem "until Yitro came and said it". (The Torah T'mima says that AZ YASHIR was not a bracha but "only" a song of praise.) Second Aliya - 11 p'sukim - 18:13-23 Moshe should teach the People what G-d requires of them, and he should also handle the most difficult questions and disputes. But the bulk of the daily judging should be assigned to qualified individuals who will be in charge of groups of ten, fifty, a hundred, and a thousand people. Yitro explains that this new system will not only make things easier for Moshe, but the people too will be benefited. (This portion of the sedra definitely seems to have occurred after Matan Torah, even if you want to say that Yitro's original arrival was before.) [Here's a thought] In the big picture, we see that Parshat Yitro with the main description of Matan Torah precedes Mishpatim with its mundane, everyday, down-to-earth laws. Yet at the beginning of Yitro, we find this out-of-sequence portion of the Mishpatim idea. And at the end of Mishpatim, we have the rest of the story of Sinai. So which really comes first - the lofty, spiritual dimensions of Judaism, or everyday Here's another possibility: Perhaps the Torah is telling us how to relive the experience of Matan Torah in our own lives. Its suggestion is "be like a convert". Take a fresh view of Jewish life. Marvel at all the things that G-d has done for Bnei Yisrael. Don't take things for granted. Approach your Judaism like Yitro did. Even if you are a Jew by birth, work on being a Jew by choice. G-d put the dramatic stories of the birth of the nation on hold, to let us take a close look at someone who doesn't have the Mountain poised above his head. Matan Torah was the mass conversion of a family-based group that is attaining nationhood. But the individual still counts. This we can learn from Yitro, the individual. Third Aliya - 4 p'sukim - 18:24-27 Moshe sends Yitro off on his journey to Midyan (to convert his family, says Rashi). Another thought... The sequence of the Yitro episode and then Matan Torah is paralleled in next week's sedra with the bulk of Mishpatim followed by the other account of Matan Torah (or the continuation of the account of Matan Torah. Can we sum it up as DERECH ERETZ KADMA
LA'TORAH? Fourth Aliya - 6 p'sukim - 19:1-6 In the third month following the Exodus, on THIS day, they (the Children of Israel) arrived at the Sinai Wilderness. Why THIS day; THAT day is how you tell a story. The Torah is not a "once-upon-a-time-a-long-time-ago story book. The Torah is a living guide for us, to be constantly rediscovered. Every day, each Jew should imagine him/herself at Sinai receiving the Torah anew. Today we have come out of Egyptian bondage; today we stand at the foot of Mt. Sinai eagerly awaiting the Divine Revelation and today we commit ourselves to G-d what He asks of us. Significantly, the words of Torah which we learn and live should never become stale. They should be in our eyes as if TODAY we have received them. We should learn Torah and do mitzvot with the freshness and enthusiasm of a first-time experience. This too fits well with the "Yitro model". The challenge: Be a true Torah Jew all your life, for as many years as G-d gives you, but have an enthusiasm that is more common among converts and Baalei
T'shuva. Fifth Aliya - 13 p'sukim - 19:7-19 [SDT] G-d tells Moshe that the People should "sanctify themselves today AND tomorrow". It is relatively easy to sanctify oneself on the day of the great miraculous events of Matan Torah. The challenge to each of us is to sanctify ourselves on the many tomorrows that follow. The days after the wondrous events, the magnificent spiritual experiences. The days when our lives return to "normal". This is what being Jewish is about. We sanctify the mundane. Therefore, there really is nothing that is mundane for us. Sixth Aliya - 20 p'sukim - 19:20-20:14 What follows is/are the Aseret HaDibrot, the Ten Commandments. They are comprised of 13 p'sukim which contain 14 mitzvot out of the Torah's 613. The Aseret HaDibrot can be viewed as both specific mitzvot as well as "chapter headings" for many of the Torah's mitzvot (e.g. LO TIGNOV is specifically the prohibition of kidnapping, and generally, the category of all prohibitions related to stealing - robbing, burglary, cheating in business, pressuring someone into selling you something that he doesn't really want to sell, moving a boundary marker... and others). MITZVA WATCH The second commandment contains several prohibitions related to idolatry. Specifically, not to believe in other gods [26] (this mitzva includes the prohibition of having no belief - atheism), not making idols [27], nor bowing to them (even without believing) [28], nor worshipping idols in any manner [29]. Note that this commandment deals with both thought and with action. The third commandment prohibits swearing in vain [30]. This is defined as (1) swearing to the truth of something that is obviously true and well-known - that the Sun is hot; (2) to swear in denial of an obvious truth - that the Moon is made of cheese (interestingly, to swear that the Moon is made of cheese is not considered a false oath nor a lie, since everyone knows that the Moon is not cheese. Only when the truth of a matter is unknown do we use the term lie and false oath. A vain oath is just as serious as a false one, so this distinction is largely academic, but it emphasizes the seriousness of being flippant in regard to swearing.); (3) to swear to violate the Torah - that one will eat pork. Such an oath is immediately void since we are considered to have taken a prior oath (at Sinai) to not eat pork. Hence, the oath is in vain and a disrespectful and potentially harmful use of G-d's name; (4) to swear to do something that is impossible - to stay awake for a full week. The common denominator of these types of vain oaths is that they all "cheapen" the use of G-d's name and threaten the smooth functioning of society which often must rely on the seriousness of a real oath. Commandment #4 deals with Shabbat and contains the positive mitzva to remember the Shabbat with Kiddush [31], and the prohibition of all manner of M'lacha, specific types of creative activities [32]. The mitzva of ZACHOR includes Kiddush as Shabbat enters, and Havdala as Shabbat leaves. The prohibitions of M'lacha are divided into 39 categories, each of which contains other related activities, usually with the same goal. For example, PLANTING is one of the 39 categories; watering, pruning, and fertilizing all help the growth of plants and are considered TOLADOT of PLANTING. Top of the second LU'ACH is the ISUR of MURDER [34], which is considered the antithesis of Belief in G-d, since murder directly negates creation of human being in His image. Commandment #7 against ADULTERY [35] is the prohibition of having relations with a married woman, but as a "chapter heading" it also points to the other forbidden relations from Acharei. #8 is LO TIGNOV [36], which, as mentioned earlier, is specifically defined as kidnapping, but is also the category header of many mitzvot in the Torah. Maybe they can all be summed up as indicating that the person who violates these kind of mitzvot puts himself above other human beings. It is obvious how this is harmful to society, and to the individual's striving for Kedusha. #9 is the prohibition of "bearing false witness" [37]. We can see in this mitzva, as well as many others, how important it is to G-d, so to speak, that we be able to function as a society. Both oaths, and to a greater extent, perhaps, testimony, are necessary for the establishment of TRUTH, in the absence of having seen the truth ourselves. So much of the dealings between people involves the trust we place in each other's word, especially when backed by an oath, and in the confidence we place in the testimony of two witnesses. Without these elements of our interpersonal relationships, we would be incapable of functioning as a society. #10 commandment against COVETING [38] sort of sums things up in that it focuses on the thought process that can lead to all types of sins. Being part of "The Big 10" points to the significance of thoughts in the whole picture, which usually considers deeds. Seventh Aliya - 9 p'sukim - 20:15-23 G-d tells Moshe to remind the People that they heard G-d speak; that they shall make no graven human images (even for art) [39]; they shall make an altar and offer sacrifices upon it; if the altar be made of stone, its stone shall not be cut with metal tools [40]. Metal implements represent the sword, which shortens life; the Altar represents the lengthening of life. From this rule comes the custom to remove or cover the bread-knife during Birkat HaMazon, since our table is likened to the Altar. (Some authorities say that this minhag applies only during the week, not on Shabbat.) The Altar may not be approached with immodest steps [41] but rather via its ramp. 21 p'sukim -Yeshayahu 6:1-7:6, 9:5-6 [The Yitro Homepage]
|