|
|
By Rabbi Avraham
Fischer. A publication of the Orthodox Union in cooperation with the Seymour
J. Abrams Orthodox Union Jerusalem World Center |
Shabbat Parshat
Tetzaveh
10 Adar I 5765 - February 19, 2005
Among the special priestly garments worn by
the Kohen Gadol is the Me’il, or Robe:
And you shall make the Robe (Me’il) [worn under] the Ephod, entirely of blue
wool. And its top opening shall be inwards; its opening shall have a border all
around of woven work; like the opening of a coat of mail shall it have; it shall
not be torn. And you shall make on its hem pomegranates of blue, purple and
scarlet wool for its hem all around, and golden bells in the midst of them all
around: a golden bell and a pomegranate, a golden bell and a pomegranate, all
around the lower edge of the Robe. And it shall be [worn] on Aharon to minister;
and its sound shall be heard when he comes to the Holy, before Hashem, and when
he goes out, so that he shall not die
(Shemot 28:31-35).
The Robe (Me’il) was long enough to come down to the feet of the Kohen Gadol.
The opening for his head was part of the weave, preventing tearing. All along
the bottom hem, at the feet of the Kohen Gadol, the Robe (Me’il) was decorated
with a series of “pomegranates” made of blue, purple and scarlet wool, and
bells. Rashi says (28:33) the “pomegranates” were
“spherical and hollow in the shape of pomegranates, made like chickens’ eggs.”
According to Rashi’s interpretation, the
“pomegranates” and golden bells alternated all around the bottom of the Me’il.
These pomegranates and bells are an indispensable part of the design of the
Me’il. They are not only decorative; they are functional:
and its sound shall be heard when he comes to the Holy, before Hashem, and when
he goes out…
Moreover, the sound of the bells prevent the death of the Kohen Gadol:
…so that he shall not die.
From this Rashi (28:35) deduces a law for all the priestly vestments:
“From the negative one can derive the positive: if he will have them he will not
be liable for death; thus, if he enters lacking one of these garments he is
liable for death at the hands of Heaven.”
Rashi’s sources are Sanhedrin 83a and Zevachim 17b; Rambam (“Laws of the
Sanctuary Vessels” 10:4) rules that this is the law.
Why must the sound of the bells be heard? And by whom?
Ramban points out that it is not usual for such splendid clothes as are worn by
the Kohen Gadol to be decorated with bells. And of course Hashem does not need
to be informed of the coming of the Kohen Gadol into the Sanctuary.
Nevertheless, the sound of the bells is needed so that
“He might enter before his Master as though with permission, because one who
enters the chamber of the King suddenly deserves death according to the
protocols of sovereignty.”
This is comparable to the dicta of mortal kings, as in the case of Achashveirosh:
Any man or woman who comes before the king to the inner court without having
been summoned, there is but one law for him, to be executed
(Esther 4:11).
Similarly, the sounding of the Me’il bells is a request for permission
when he comes to the Holy, before Hashem, …
And permission is also requested before leaving the Presence of the King:
and when he goes out.
In addition, explains Rabbenu Bachya (ben Asher ben Hlava, 13th Century) based
on Ramban,
“It is a warning to the angels that they clear the way for the King’s close
friend [the Kohen Gadol] in honor of the King, so that he can enter and serve
Him in private. Also, so that the Kohen will not be harmed if he comes in
suddenly … because the attendants [angels] who are there around the Divine
Presence will attack him.”
Hashem is ministered by His angelic hosts; still, He desires that His earthly
servants worship Him. The jealous angels are bidden by the bells of the Me’il to
make way for Hashem’s preferred human ministers, the Jewish People, as led by
the Kohen Gadol.
R. Shmuel Alter (20th Century) in Likutei Batar Likutei, derives from the Me’il
bells a message to Aharon, and indeed to every community leader. He must first
know that leadership is not mastery over his people, but service to them:
And it shall be on Aharon to minister.
When he has internalized this idea, and projects it through his all words and
deeds, then and only then will he be heeded by his people:
and its sound [KOLO, literally, his voice] shall be heard.
Of course, many leaders are accepted by their people when they are first
inaugurated:
when he comes to the Holy;
but the true indication that the leader is followed comes when he has completed
his term:
and when he goes out.
And then his fame and good works will endure forever:
he shall not die.
Our Sages derive from the example of the Me’il bells another important lesson in
proper interpersonal behavior. Rabbi Akiva instructed his son R. Yehoshua that,
among the seven ways a true talmid chacham can be recognized is
“Do not enter your house ― and certainly not your friend’s house ― suddenly (Pesachim
112a).”
In order to show sensitivity to the privacy of everyone in the house, one must
announce his coming by ringing the bell or knocking on the door. Furthermore,
“When R. Yochanan would enter his house he would make a shaking sound, because
it says, and its sound shall be heard when he comes to the Holy (Vayikra Rabba
21).”
R. Yochanan applies the term the Holy to his own home! Our homes – especially in
the absence of a Temple – are the places where we imbibe sanctity, where our
every action is a way to serve Hashem.
The bells of the Me’il are meant to be heard by all – by Hashem and by His
angels, as well as by every community leader and everyone in our holy homes.
TETZAVEH
“And you shall make holy garments for Aharon your brother for honor and
for beauty (lekavod uletiferet) (Shemot 28: 2).”
The Ramban asks: How does one make garments that satisfy the imperative of
“lekavod uletiferet?” He answers that we copy the sartorial style of
kings, especially the kings of Persia.
We know a Persian king: Achashverosh. He threw a party: “He made a
feast... He showed the riches of his glorious kingdom and yakar tiferet
gedulato – the excellent tiferet of his greatness (Esther 1:3-5).” We
translate tiferet here as “majesty.” Still, what at the party showed
majesty?
Regarding tiferet gedulato, Rabbi Yose the son of Hanina said: “This
teaches that he wore priestly garments (Megilla 12a).” “Tiferet” alludes
to priestly garments based on the words “lekavod uletiferet” found in our
parshah.
So, what can this mean? In Ramban, Persia’s kings dictate the design for
the priests’ sacral clothing; in our oral tradition, a Persian king
specifically dons the priestly garments as a special honor for himself.
The Torah states clearly that there must be a High Priest. Not so a king.
“Kingship” can be assimilated to the High Priest who will exercise a
combined authority described by the term “eved HaShem – God’s servant.” In
practice, only Moshe succeeded in combining the two roles. From Moshe,
religious authority passed to the priests; kingship went on to have a
complicated subsequent history.
Achashverosh would not have desired the priestly dress for its faux
Persian style. Rather, the sacral dress suggested to him the unique role
of God's servant, of political and religious leadership combined.
Achashverosh coveted this double-leadership. For that glory, he dressed
himself in priestly garb.
In Israel we have achieved a kind of malchut (kingship). That leadership
exercises authority in the political realm but does not inspire devotion
to God. Perhaps, this is the enterprise of another generation.
Shabbat Shalom.
Rabbi Chaim Brovender
Yerushalayim
*D’var Torah from Aloh Na'aleh:
an initiative of former North
American Rabbis and laymen who successfully made Aliyah, aimed at
highlighting the centrality of Israel and promoting Aliyah. They send
emissaries – Rabbis, academicians, and others – on speaking-tours
throughout the U.S. and Canada.
Contact information:
Rabbi Yerachmiel Roness ,
Exec. Dir., Aloh Naaleh,
At the OU Center, 22 Keren HaYesod
Alohnaaleh@israelcenter.co.il
Tel.(02) 566-7787 ex. 254 |
|