The Harold M. & Pearl Jacobs Shabbat Learning Center

OU Torah Insights Project

Parshat Shelach
July 1, 2000

Rabbi Yitzchok Feldman


Although Yehoshua Bin Nun and Calev Ben Yefuneh united against the scheme of the other ten spies, they were not of the same mind, or manner, in their opposition.  The differences between them, according to the Chafetz Chaim, reveal two very different ways to present unpopular positions in the face of a hostile majority.

It is clear from the beginning that Yehoshua and Calev will carry themselves differently.  Yehoshua receives a blessing from Moshe Rabbeinu to save him from the other spies; Calev does not.  During their tour of the land of Canaan, Calev goes to pray at the graveside of the Patriarchs in Chevron, while Yehoshua remains with the group.  Finally, at the end of the episode, Calev is singled out for maintaining a “different spirit.” No such praise is given to Yehoshua.

In his book, Guarding the Tongue, the Chafetz Chaim offers two ways to fight against a popular consensus: One can fight it constantly and openly, or one can bide his time silently, waiting for the right moment to arise, and then strike decisively.

There are, he says, advantages and dangers to both methods.  An open and loud opposition offers continual protection against any influence from the majority. At the same time, the majority knows where the opposition stands, will seek to suppress it.

On the other hand, a silent opposition, while safer, is also vulnerable to inner erosion and even a collapse in resolve. 

Yehoshua, who was an open opponent, needed special protection from the other spies, and therefore received a blessing from Moshe. Calev, however, was a silent opponent, and therefore needed a reservoir of inner strength, which is why he went to pray at the graveside of the Patriarchs. Their legacy represented the inner strength Calev would need.

Likewise, the delivery of their opposition was different.  Yehoshua cried out against the spies, but he was ineffective.  His opposition was expected, and the spies were able to dismiss him as the lone angry man.

Calev’s report, however, came as a surprise. He had an attentive audience, because he was expected to deliver the final blow to Yehoshua’s position.  This is why his support of Yehoshua, brought about a desperate attempt by the spies to prove their point with a fusillade of slander against the Promised Land.

The Chafetz Chaim points out that sometimes the Torah mentions Yehoshua first and sometimes it mentions Calev first.  Although Yehoshua was the main student of Moshe and succeeded him as leader, Calev is still mentioned first at times to emphasize that both approaches are valid.

A loud, predictable opposition may be the way for some, but a quiet, directed opposition is more appropriate for others.

Rabbi Yitzchok Feldman

Rabbi Feldman is rav of Congregation Emek Beracha, formerly known as the Palo Alto Orthodox Minyan, in Palo Alto, California.

OU Torah Insights Project Archives


Torah Insights is brought to you every week
as a service of the Community and Synagogue Services Department
of the Orthodox Union

Your comments are always welcome

www.ou.org