The Harold M. & Pearl Jacobs Shabbat Learning Center

OU Torah Insights Project

Parshat Korach
July 8, 2000


Rabbi Yaakov Benamou


Pirkei Avot states, “Any argument that is for the sake of Heaven will last; but one that is not for the sake of Heaven will not last.” The mishnah offers Hillel and Shamai as the example of Heavenly opponents - and their debates are relevant to this day. Korach and his followers, on the other hand, are the prototypical example of those whose conflict arose from egotistical motivations. Those types of disputes, the mishnah guarantees, are doomed to fail.

Elsewhere in the Torah, Kayin and Hevel had a dispute in which Kayin killed Hevel. The Torah is very short on detail in describing the argument: “Kayin spoke with his brother Hevel, and it happened when they were in the field that Kayin rose up against his brother Hevel and killed him.”

According to Bereishit Rabbah, the argument was about dividing the world between the two of them. Kayin’s disagreement with the proposed division led him to kill his own brother. G-d confronted Kayin, who was sincerely remorseful and begged forgiveness.

The first thing we notice when taking a look at Korach's tragic story is that the story is depicted in much detail. Korach, a cousin of Moshe, gathers two hundred fifty followers and openly rebels against Moshe and Aharon, claiming that Moshe took the leadership for himself, and reserved the priesthood exclusively for his brother, Aharon.

Moshe, the most humble of all people, offers a Divine solution. He suggests that they all gather the next morning in the same place and G-d will identify the true leader. The following morning the truth is brought forth - Korach and his men are swallowed into the earth.

Why did Kayin, who took a life, merit repentance, when Korach did not? What was so terrible about his deed?

The Talmud teaches that “the congregation of Korach and his followers have no share in the World to Come.” In disputing Moshe, he disputed G-d . He also felt no remorse. Even when he knew that his family, including babies, would pay the price of his rebellion, he didn’t cease to oppose Moshe.

Kayin, on the other hand, stopped after he realized the severity of his dispute, and he expressed his remorse by saying, “My iniquity is too great to be forgiven.” 

So how do we know when an argument is for the sake of Heaven? The arguments of Shammai and Hillel last until today, in yeshivot and batei midrash across the world. Each of their views was given not for personal gain, but for the sake of Heaven.

Korach's battle with Moshe, however, was based on personal gain. Korach and his cohorts each had a completely different motivation - himself. Thus, their battle did not last. Only a battle with Divine intent remains forever.

Rabbi Yaakov Benamou

Rabbi Benamou is spiritual leader of Herzlia Adas Yeshurun Congregation in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

OU Torah Insights Project Archives


Torah Insights is brought to you every week
as a service of the Community and Synagogue Services Department
of the Orthodox Union

Your comments are always welcome

www.ou.org