|

Parshat Ki Tisa
Rabbi
Avrohom Gordimer
The Chet Ha-Egel ("Sin of the
Golden Calf") was a junction of downfall and tragedy, as well as an
event which taught us how to do teshuva (repentance) and reconcile with
God. At the beginning of Parshas Chukas, Rashi quotes the Medrash
Tanchuma which explains that the mitzvah of Parah Adumah ("Red Heifer")
served to rectify the Chet Ha-Egel. It is true that a calf and a cow are
of the same breed, but is there a deeper interrelationship of the Chet
and the Parah which underlies the teshuva which the Parah Adumah
precipiates for the Chet Ha-Egel?
Rashi, based on a Medrash, explains that the that the people sought to
make a physical image (the Egel) upon the failure of Moshe Rabbeinu to
descend from Har Sinai at the time which they presumed or calculated
should have been the end of Moshe's 40-day stay on the mount. They
miscalculated and thereafter deviated, crafting the Egel.
This explanation reveals the fault which lay in the the inner recesses
of those who served the Egel. Rather than trusting in God and in Moshe's
word that their leader would descend from Mt. Sinai at the correct time,
the people used their own human perceptions and judgment to determine
how to conduct themselves. They acted upon their subjective
understanding,
thereby violating the Torah in the extreme.
The Parah Adumah teaches us that we cannot decide or define halacha
based on our subjective understanding. The Parah Adumah is
counterintuitive, as it purifies the t'meim (impure) and contaminates
the pure (those who prepare it). Its character and theory are beyond
human comprehension, as the Gemara teaches, and it is therefore the
quintessential Chok, defying human logic in its workings. Thus,
fulfillment of the mitzvah of the Parah Adumah is a statement of
submission to Hashem's ultimate authority and autonomy over halacha,
subjugating human logic and perceptions to the unfathomable Divine
intent and decision. This is precisely why the Parah rectifies the Chet
Ha-Egel, such that the Parah declares that humans cannot act upon their
own, limited understanding in defining halacha; rather, they must submit
to God's parameters and definitions.
With this in mind, perhaps we can understand the placement of a few
other miztvos which precede the Chet ha-Egel in this week's parshah. The
Torah introduces the parshah with the command to donate a half-shekel ("Machatzis
Ha-Shekel") for the Mishkan, and it is declared that all must give the
same amount - rich or poor (ibid. 30:16). This mitzvah teaches the trait
of humility in God's work, such that the creative nature of constructing
the Mishkan was limited in a way that all were equal, and none could
stand out as being a bigger donor. So, too, the command not to build the
Mishkan on Shabbos (ibid. 31:13-17) limits Man's creative work and his
personal, subjective role in mitvzos, in submission to Hashem's overall
authority.
The mitzvah of the Kiyor ("laver" - ibid. 31:17-21) instructs us that we
must purify and prepare ourselves before serving Hashem. We cannot just
jump into His avodah (service), as to do so is to fail to recognize its
import and imbue ourselves with a proper attitude. We must first realize
before Whom we shall stand and we must elevate ourselves to the
requisite level of sanctity beforehand. So, too, the command to anoint
the Mishkan and its vessels with Shemen Ha-Mishchah (Oil of Anointment -
ibid. vv. 22-33) conveys the requirement of preparation to service God,
and the prohibitions of using the oil for personal reasons and of
concocting personal doses of it and of the holy incense for oneself
(ibid. v. 37) also reflect submission to God and a cognizance that we
cannot tamper with and exercise control over mitzvos.
God created Man with specialized talents to serve Him uniquely; however,
this service is obviously and by definition predicated on complete
submission to Hashem's Will. When personal talents are used to undermine
or tamper with halacha, the result is deemed idolatry, even when it
appears to be Torah activity.
For a full library of divrei Torah, please see
TorahHeights.com
Archive
www.ou.org
|