Re-Counting the Prophets - Rabbi Pinchas Frankel

Haftarah for Parshat "HaChodesh" - Shemini - 5760

Inauguration of the Third Temple -
the Bait HaMikdash of the Mashiach

Some general background on the "Haftarot"

Introduction to the Haftarah

"Shabbat HaChodesh" is the fourth and final one of the special Shabbatot whose readings from the Torah and the Prophets were chosen by CHAZAL to be read in the Purim-Pesach timeframe. On this Shabbat we read as the Maftir the section from Shemot beginning "This month is for you …," (Shemot, 12:1-20), with the associated Haftarah taken from Yechezkel, Chapters 45 and 46, describing the inauguration of the "Bayit Shelishi," the Third Temple, to be built by the Mashiach.

The text of the Haftarah used by the Ashkenazim is very similar to that used by the Sefardim. Ashkenazic communities read from Yechezkel 45:16 through Yechezkel 46:18, while Sefardic communities read from Yechezkel 45:18 through Yechezkel 46:15.

This Prophecy of Yechezkel, the Prophet who was with the Jewish People in their Exile in Babylonia, must have brought comfort to those "unable to sing the song of Hashem in a foreign land," (Tehilim/Psalms 137) because it spoke of the ultimate redemption of the Jewish People.

Outline of the Haftarah

Yechezkel, 45:16-17

Obligation of the "Nasi" (meaning of term to be discussed below) to bring the Burnt Offerings, Grain Offerings and Drink Offerings on the Holidays, the Beginnings of New Months, and on each Shabbat. On each such occasion, he is required to bring the various sacrifices to atone for the House of Israel.

Yechezkel, 45:18-20

Putting of blood of a bullock upon the door-posts of the Temple and upon the four corners of the Altar, and upon the posts of the Gate of the Inner Court … so shall you make atonement for the Temple.

Yechezkel, 45:21-25

The "Nasi" shall prepare the sacrifices of Pesach in the First Month and of Sukkot in the Seventh Month. He shall use a bullock for a Sin-Offering on the fourteenth day, a burnt offering of seven bullocks and seven rams on each of the seven days, and a he-goat daily for a Sin-Offering.

Yechezkel, 46:1-12

The Gate of the Inner Court facing East shall be shut the six working days, but on Shabbat, it shall be opened, and on the day of Rosh Chodesh, it shall be opened. (see diagram on Page 393 of "The Midrash Says on the WEEKLY HAFTAROS" by Rabbi Moshe Weissman; Bnei Yaakov Publications)

The "Nasi" shall enter by way of the Outer Porch of that Gate. The priests shall bring his offerings while he prostrates himself. After he leaves by the Gate, the People shall come and worship in the same manner.

On the holidays, the "Nasi" shall enter the Northern Gate and exit the Southern with the People (because of the principle "With the multitude of People is Greater Glory for the King") or enter the Southern and exit the Northern.

He shall bring a Grain-Offering and he may donate a Peace-Offering.

Yechezkel 46:13-15

A Daily Offering shall be brought each morning. (see or click (if you're impatient) for later for significance of this)

Yechezkel 46:16-18

The "Nasi" may give a present to his sons of his property, and it will remain with them in perpetuity (forever). But if he gives a present from his property to another member of his entourage, it should return to him at the "Yovel," (the Jubilee Year), when transferred property in Eretz Yisrael is returned to its original owner.

But the "Nasi" may not give of the property of his servants to his children; rather, only from his own, in order that My People shall not be scattered again from their inheritance!

Discussion of the Haftarah

Who is Yechezkel's "Nasi"?

Connections with the Maftir and with this week's Parshah

Deviations (at first glance) from the Laws of the Torah

Who is Yechezkel's "Nasi"?

It should be noted that this term appears in the Torah as well, in Parshat Vayikra (the first Parshah in Sefer) Vayikra 4:22, "When a ruler sins (by accident - PF)." There the term is translated "leader" or "ruler." These translations seem to be consistent with RASHI's comment there on the term "Asher," as in "Asher Nasi Yecheta," where he says that the meaning is "fortunate." Because "fortunate is the generation whose leader cares enough to bring a sacrifice on his accidental sins; how much more would he regret and repent for his purposeful sins! There the term seems to signify any kind of leader: a Judge, a Prophet or a King.

However, somewhat inconsistently, RASHI on verse Yechezkel 45:16, where the verse mentions "Nasi," says "I believe that this "Nasi" is speaking of the "Kohen Gadol," the High Priest, and likewise all references to the "Nasi" here in Yechezkel. This accords well with the description in Parshat Shemini of the Inaugural of the Mishkan, where Aharon, the High Priest, took the leading role, as it says there (Vayikra 9:7-8), "And Moshe said to Aharon, 'Approach the altar and perform the service of the Sin-Offering and the Burnt-Offering and atone for yourself and the House of Israel.' "

A difficulty with this interpretation is, "Why didn't Yechezkel say "Kohen Gadol" if that was what he meant, rather than "Nasi?" A possible answer is that perhaps the punishment received by Moshe, according to CHAZAL, for his stubbornness at the Burning Bush, when he refused initially to accept Hashem's Mission of taking the People of Israel out of slavery by himself; namely, the loss of the priesthood to Aharon, because Moshe was originally supposed to have been the Ruler and the Priest, will be rescinded in the time of the Mashiach. Then, while the priesthood will not be taken away from the descendants of Aharon, but the descendants of David, who will be the rulers, may also be able to officiate in the Temple. (?)

RASHI himself alludes to the other interpretation, when he says, "I heard in the name of Menachem (Ibn Seruk - a great grammarian and commentator on the Bible) that the meaning of 'Nasi' is King."

In that case, the King at the time of the Inauguration of the Third Temple would be none other than the Mashiach himself! Which leads to the same question posed above, from the opposite side, "If Yechezkel meant the Mashiach, certainly a special personage in Jewish History and deserving of mention, why didn't he say so?"

Connections between the Haftarah and the Maftir and with Parshat Shemini

  • Both the Maftir and the Haftarah deal with very special "Nisan's," the first Month of the Hebrew Calendar. In the Maftir, in Mitzrayim, Hashem said to Moshe on Rosh Chodesh Nisan, "This is for you the first of the Months," meaning that this is the birth month of the Jewish People, its emergence into history as the "Chosen People."

The Haftarah speaks of the Jewish People at another very special time, the culmination of its history as the Chosen People, but now recognized as such by all the nations of the world. Under the leadership of Mashiach ben David, their Anointed King and Redeemer, they are inaugurating the Third Temple, as the Spiritual Center for the whole world.

  • In the Maftir, the Jewish People was asked to show its faith in Hashem by taking the god of the Egyptians and offering it as the first Pesach sacrifice; in the Haftarah, as well, the Period of the Inauguration of the Third Temple also begins with the offering of the Pesach sacrifice.

  • In the Maftir, the Jews were commanded to smear the blood of their sacrifice upon their door-posts, to symbolize Hashem's "passing over" them and sparing them from destruction during the Plague of the First Born. In the Haftarah, as well, we find smearing of the blood of a sacrifice on the door-posts of the Temple, the House of G-d, symbolizing Hashem's protection of the Jewish People from destruction innumerable times by innumerable enemies at innumerable places throughout its history.

  • On the Eighth Day, "Yom HaShemini," always symbolizing an event of extra-historical significance, the Mishkan was inaugurated, as the first manifestation of G-d's "Residence," so to speak, on Earth. In the Haftarah, at the close of the "adolescence" of the world, G-d's Presence again takes up "residence" on earth, in a Home never again to be destroyed.

Deviations (at first Glance) by Yechezkel from the Laws of the Torah

This is one of the most striking aspects of this Haftarah. Rav Yissachar Yaakovson in "Chazon HaMikra," published by Sinai - Tel Aviv, cites a list of six questions formulated by Don Yitzchak Abarbanel (1437-1508), together with Abarbanel's answer to them.

The Six Questions

  • With regard to the sacrifices of Pesach, Yechezkel says that the "Nasi" should offer in his own behalf and in behalf of the People a bullock as a Sin-Offering (Yechezkel 45:22). In the Torah there is no reference at all in connection with the Sacrifices of Pesach to a bullock as a "Sin-Offering;" the only Sin-Offering is to be brought from a a "Sair," a goat (Bamidbar 28:22). And if one were to say that this bullock was a Sin-Offering brought on the fourteenth of Nisan, the Eve of Pesach, that would be an addition to a Commandment and an absolutely new law not mentioned in the Torah.

Secondly, with regard to what Yechezkel says in 45:23, "Seven days shall you bring Burnt-Offerings to Hashem of seven bullocks and seven rams," here too one would be adding to the Commandments of the Torah, for the Burnt Offering of Pesach was not, according to the Torah, other than two bullocks and one ram and seven sheep. And Yechezkel would according to this be adding to the bullocks and adding to the rams and subtracting from, indeed totally eliminating the sheep! In doing this, he would be transgressing on "You shall not add to the Torah" and "You shall not subtract from the Torah."

Thirdly, when Yechezkel says (45:24) "And a Grain-Offering for the bullock one ephah and one ephah for each ram," where he makes the amount for the bullock equal to the amount for the ram, one ephah for each, and behold in the Torah it is written (Bamidbar 28:20) "Three esronim for a bullock and two esronim for a ram."

And fourth, when Yechezkel says (45:24) "And as for oil, one "hin" for each ephah," while the Torah says in Parshat Shelach (Bamidbar (15:6-10) that regarding the Grain- Offering associated with the ram, that is made from two esronim of flour, that it requires one third of a "hin," and for the Grain-Offering associated with the bullock, that is made from three esronim of flour, the Torah requires one half of a "hin" of oil; how then does Yechezkel make the ratio equal to one "hin" per ephah for both the bullock and the ram?

Thus we have in connection with the Sacrifices of Pesach four large deviations!

  • Without going into all the details, as above, there are similar inconsistencies between Yechezkel's description of the Sacrifices of Sukkot and that of the Torah. One of these is that the Torah has the amount of bullocks brought per day varying from thirteen to seven, while according to Yechezkel the number is constant!

  • the Sacrifice of Shabbat - Yechezkel makes the Offering dependent on one's financial status, while in the Torah, there is no such provision.

  • Rosh Chodesh - Many of the quantities are different here as well from those called for by the Torah!

  • Yechezkel mentions the Daily Morning Tamid Burnt-Offering but fails to mention the Daily Evening Burnt-Offering.

  • Yechezkel fails to mention the holidays of Shavuot, Rosh HaShanah, Yom HaKippurim and Shmini Azteret at all

With regard to the above questions, the Sages in the Talmud (Tractate Menachot 45a) had great difficulty to the point where Rabbi Yochanan said that we would have to wait for Eliyahu HaNavi to explain the deviations, as the Talmud occasionally falls back upon Eliyahu when it says "Taiku," "Tishbi Yetaretz Kushyot Ubaayot!" (Elijah the Tishbite will answer the questions and difficulties we are unable to answer).

R' Chisda said in the name of Rav (Tractate Shabbat 13b) that the Sages wanted to be "gonez," to hide, and not include in the sacred canon the Book of Yechezkel because of these deviations from the Torah. Were it not for the individual named Chananiah ben Chizkiah ben Goron who should be remembered for good, because he took a large quantity of oil with him up to his attic and worked on these discrepancies until he had resolved them all! But, because of our sins, we lost his solutions.

Among the Bible commentators, RADAK also says that "We have no choice, but to say that there will occur a change in the Law of the Torah in Messianic Times!"

Abarbanel and Malbim, though, are less nervous. They point out that these deviations are connected with Inaugural Sacrifices, in this case, that of the Third Temple, a long period, from Pesach till Sukkot. But every Inaugural - the Mishkan, the First Temple and the Second Temple, had unique features. The Sacrifices discussed by Yechezkel are the Inaugural Sacrifices; it is quite possible that they will be performed in addition to the regular Sacrifices.

And in this case, there will also be a good reason to extend the Inaugural Period from Pesach to Sukkot, because Pesach will be the beginning of the "Geulah," the Salvation, while the War of Gog and Magog, the war that is to precede the Final Redemption, is prophesied to occur on Sukkot.

Rabbi Pinchas Frankel

Rabbi Frankel is an Educational Coordinator at the OU

Test Your Haftarah IQ!