A Second Opinion - Rabbi Pinchas Frankel
Parshat Lech Lecha - 5762

The Tragedy of Pirud, Separation

Parshat Lech Lecha begins our contact with the “Avot” and specifically, begins with the command of HaShem to Avram to leave his land, his birthplace and his father’s house, and to go to the land that He will show to him.  “And Avram went in accordance with what G-d had said to him…And Avram  took Sarai his wife and his nephew, Lot, and all the wealth that he had amassed, and the ‘souls they had made in Charan’ (RASHI explains this expression as meaning ‘individuals they had brought under the wings of the Shechinah; Avraham converting the men and Sarah converting the women’).”

Then the Torah describes Avram’s descent into Mitzrayim, because of a famine, a move that would be repeated by his grandson, Yaakov, and his entire family.  Egyptian society was completely corrupt in the area of sexual morality, as Yoseph would re-discover prior to that second descent.  Avram realized that if the Egyptians knew that Sarai was his wife, his life would be in danger, so he asked her to say that she was his sister, and allow herself to be taken to the house of the Pharaoh.

Although most commentators make allowances for Avram, RAMBAN comments that it was a “great sin” for Avram to put Sarai’s life in danger.  According to RAMBAN, the Torah does not refrain from telling the truth about our ancestors who, despite their greatness, were only human beings, and therefore not perfect.  I’d like to offer a possible extension of this idea, whereby the Torah teaches that pirud, separation, or unresolved machloket, disagreement, can lead to major unforeseen consequences.

The Torah tells the story of the separation of Lot from Avram, Lot’s residence in S’dom, a great “World War” in which Lot is taken captive by the victors, and his rescue by Avram.  The destruction of S’dom is then described, preceded by Avram’s great debate with HaShem over the justice of the punishment.  All this is interwoven with the birth of Yishmael and the promise of the birth of Yitzchak.

It is possible, I would suggest, that the separation from Lot, the destruction of S’dom, and events that  followed in the life of Lot; namely, the birth of Amon and Moav and their historic consequences, in the eternal separation from Israel of those nations, had their origin, to some extent, in another mistake on the part of Avram; namely, giving up on Lot and on S’dom, that is only hinted at in the Torah.

In Chapter 13, the Torah describes Avram coming up from Egypt, “he with his wife and all that was his… and Lot was with him.. and Avram was very laden with livestock, silver and gold” (Bereshit 13:1-2), some of those riches having been given him by Pharaoh in “exchange” for his “sister.”  The Torah continues, “Also Lot who went with Avram had flocks, cattle and tents,” (Bereshit 13:5), the uncle, naturally, having “shared the wealth” with his nephew.  However, “The land could not support them dwelling together, for their possessions were abundant…And there was quarreling between the herdsmen of Avram’s livestock and the herdsmen of Lot’s livestock…” (Bereshit 13:7)

At this point, Avram may have made a critical mistake; “So Avram said to Lot, ‘Please let there be no strife between me and you… HiPa’red na me-alai, Please separate from me; If you go left, then I will go right, and if you go right, then I will go left’ ” (Bereshit 13:8-9).  VaYipa’redu ish me-al achiv;” “And they separated one from the other.”

And the rest is history.  Lot chooses the territory that includes S’dom, that Avram places outside the domain where he will teach.  Immediately thereafter, the Torah describes the population of S’dom as “exceedingly evil and sinful before HaShem” (Berershit 13:13).

A “World War” breaks out in the Middle East, “four Kings against the five” (Bereshit 14:9).  S’dom is defeated; its population and property are taken, and Lot is kidnapped.  Avram learns the fate of his nephew.  He gathers his meager forces and pursues the four kings, soundly defeating them with the aid of HaShem, and retrieves the people and the wealth (Bereshit 14:1-17).

The  King of S’dom says to Avram, surprisingly, “Give me the souls, and take the possessions;” using the same “soul-language” that the Torah uses in the beginning of the Parshah, in describing the activities of Avram and Sarai, perhaps as an unconscious plea to Avram to share his teachings with the People of S’dom.  Avram responds to the offer of the wealth by saying that he has learned his lesson not to accept the smallest amount of material wealth from another human being, but he returns the people, including Lot, to the King of S’dom, who resumes, along with his citizens, his evil ways.

“After these events,” HaShem announces to Avraham his intention to destroy S’dom and its twin city, Amora  (Bereshit 18:20), “And HaShem said, ‘The outcry from S’dom and Amora has become great …’. ”  Avraham then launches into a desperate dialogue with HaShem, trying to convince Him to spare the cities.

The language used is “VaYigash Avraham,” and “Avraham approached (HaShem), very similar to the language used in connection with Yehudah, about whom the Torah will say, “VaYigash Elav Yehudah,” “And Yehudah approached Yoseph.”  Yehudah took upon himself the responsibility of the brothers because he had, according to RASHI on verse Bereshit 44:32, “tied himself into the matter with a tight knot; to be excluded, if he failed, from both worlds.”

Perhaps here too, Avraham, considered by Jewish Tradition, as the “Amud HaChesed,” the Pillar of Kindness in the World, felt responsible for separating himself from Lot, and for not having attempted to teach the inhabitants of S’dom, as he had attempted to teach the rest of the region, the importance of kindness.  An argument in favor of the above interpretation can be made from the fact that Chizkiyahu 16:55 refers to the City of S’dom and its suburbs returning in the time of the Mashiach, to their original, pre-destruction, state.

Even if the above interpretation is true, it must be remembered that the “Avot” made many good decisions and they made a few mistakes. Both the good decisions and the mistakes had cosmic consequences.  The good decisions, in the “eyes” of the Creator, vastly exceed, in quantity and quality, the mistakes.  And the cosmic consequences of the good decisions vastly outweigh the cosmic consequences of the mistakes.

Of course, it is probably true that Avraham saw correctly that his household and the household of Lot were truly incompatible, and therefore the separation was justified and necessary, and also made an accurate judgment that there was no possibility of persuading the People of S’dom to change their ways.

But it is nevertheless important to realize that the Torah paints for us unvarnished and accurate pictures of our great ancestors, from the perspective of “For there is no man so wholly righteous on earth that he always does good, and never sins” (Kohelet 7:20

Rabbi Pinchas Frankel
Rabbi Frankel is an Educational Coordinator at the OU

Archive