A Second Opinion - Rabbi Pinchas Frankel

Parshat Vayigash - 5761

The Invisible Yoseph

The four Parshiyot Vayeshev, Miketz, Vayigash, the Parshah read this Shabbat, and Vayechi, the last Parshah in the Book of Bereshit, of course involve many themes.  But the central conflict about which they all revolve is that between Yoseph and his brothers.

The Torah begins its account of that conflict in Parshat Vayeshev, where we find the family of Yaakov torn apart by dissension between the brothers, dissension that Yaakov either does not notice, hardly likely, but whose actions, in any case, only seem to exacerbate the situation.  These actions include his  giving to Yoseph a "Ketonet Pasim," an embroidered tunic, made of strips of variously colored fine  wool, as a symbol of leadership, according to the Biblical commentator, the Sforno.   The Kli Yakar adds that after Reuven discredited himself by tampering with Yaakov's bed (Bereshit 35:22), Yaakov demoted him from the position of "Bechor," "First-Born," and appointed Yoseph, the youngest of the brothers, in his place!

Yoseph adds fuel to the fire by speaking words of slander against the sons of Leah to his father,  based on his mistaken impressions that they had violated the prohibition of "eating the limb of a live  animal," that they would insult the sons of Zilpah and Bilhah by calling them "servants," and that they  seemed to have committed sexual crimes.  The relationship between Yoseph and his brothers deteriorates to the extent that the Torah tells us in Bereshit 37:4 that "His brothers saw that it was he whom their father loved most of all the brothers, so they hated him; and they could not speak to him peaceably."

His worst offense in the eyes of the brothers is that they perceive in him the trait of insufferable, and dangerous-to-them, arrogance.  For he dreamed, and insisted upon telling them of his dreams, that he would ultimately rule over them, and over their father and his mother as well.  

Such is the extent of their developing hatred of their brother that they begin to see him as a "Rodef," a "Pursuer," who is pursuing them in order to accomplish their spiritual death by causing their father to curse them.  The "din," or law, of the "Rodef" is that if one sees a person pursuing another with the intention of killing him, then one is permitted to take the "law into one's own hands," and kill the "Rodef," the "Pursuer," to save the life of the "Pursued."  In their eyes, Yoseph is the "Pursuer," and they are the "Pursued."

The brothers get their chance to implement this verdict against Yoseph when he comes on a mission, described in Bereshit 37:13-14, to visit them and inquire after "their welfare and the welfare of the  flocks that they were tending."  This mission was initiated by their father Yaakov, who "should have  realized," one would think at first glance, that this was a terribly dangerous situation into which he was  sending his favorite son, were it not for the prophetic, sub-conscious awareness, that Yaakov had, according to the Midrash Bereshit Rabbah, quoted by RASHI, that somehow it would contribute to the  realization of the prophecy of his grandfather Avraham that his descendants would be "strangers in a strange land" (Bereshit 15:13).  

The brothers, sitting as a "Bet Din," a court, condemn Yoseph to death, but then, at the urging of Reuven (who was really hoping to save Yoseph, as testified by the Torah itself), commute his  sentence to indirect death by starvation or snake or scorpion bite and throw him into a pit, and then, at the urging of Yehudah, commute the sentence further to slavery.  When a caravan of traders appears on the scene, Yoseph is pulled out of the pit, and sold into slavery, for the price of twenty shekalim, the price of a pair of sandals.  He eventually winds up in Egypt, the "House of Bondage."  

Eventually, by the agency of dreams, Yoseph rises to the position of "Mishneh LeMelech," Viceroy to the Pharaoh, and is placed in charge of the stockpiling (during the seven "years of plenty") and distribution (during the seven "years of famine") of food.  Famine grips Canaan as well, and the brothers now reverse the earlier mission of Yoseph, and travel to him, at the urging of their father, to obtain foodstuffs to help them survive the famine.

The following question has bothered me for years, as we read through these Parshiyot:  It was well known in Egypt, and must have been as well in the surrounding countries that sent their populations to this man who had been given responsibility for their survival during this crisis of famine, that he was not a native Egyptian.  That he was in fact an "Ivri," a Hebrew, and a former slave, who had risen to prominence and power by virtue of his amazing ability to interpret dreams; in particular, the double dream of the Pharaoh that had forecast the seven-year cycles of plenty followed by famine.

The Egyptians, in fact, despite their dependence upon him, motivated presumably by deeply ingrained feelings of racial and religious superiority would not eat together with Yoseph, the "Ivri."  As we see in Bereshit 43:32, where we find, "And they served Yoseph and the brothers separately, and the Egyptians who ate with them separately, for the Egyptians could not bear to eat food with the Hebrews, for it was loathsome to the Egyptians."

And finally, according to the Midrash Bereshit Rabbah 84:7, Yoseph looked just like Yaakov, their father! 

The question is, given all these hints, the fact that the "Egyptian" Prince was in fact a Hebrew, that he  was a former slave, that his rise to power had been by his uncanny ability to interpret dreams, and the    fact that he looked like his father, why did it not enter the minds of any of the brothers, before Yoseph revealed his identity, that he was in fact Yoseph their brother?  Although the Midrash Bereshit Rabbah 91:7, attempts to answer the question by saying that he recognized them because when he  last saw them, they were adults, with beards, and when they last saw him, he was only seventeen,  and beardless, this hardly seems an adequate reason for their not recognizing him.  Yet, as the Torah testifies (Bereshit 42:8), when they appeared before him, "Yoseph recognized his brothers, but they  did not recognize him."

We can only answer that the brothers must have been fixated on the idea that Yoseph's dreams of  mastery were false, they must have been false for the brothers to be vindicated in their act of selling  him, to the extent that they would not allow another possibility to enter their minds.  They searched for Yoseph in all the slave-markets of Egypt, hoping indeed to recognize him by his remarkable  handsomeness, but when the powerful and strikingly handsome Prince of Egypt stood before them,  they could not acknowledge that the man standing before them, albeit now bearded, was none other  than the brother whom they had sold into slavery, Yoseph.

We see here the power of pre-conceived notions, especially when the ego is involved, for they had been portrayed as his subjects in those old dreams, to blind one to the truth.  They could not believe them, for had they not said (Bereshit 37:20), "…And we will see what will become of his dreams."

The sin of the Sale of Yoseph is the model for the terrible sin of "sinat chinam," causeless hatred, of letting pre-conceived notions, images based on grudges and enmities that we cannot let go of, concerning our brothers, obscure and blind us to their very brotherhood.

We must fight this tendency, and allow ourselves to relate to our brothers as brothers, obnoxious though they may seem, because who's to say that the feeling is not mutual!

Over the centuries of Exile, our brothers may have taken on characteristics that make them look very different, and perhaps behave very differently from us, in superficial and sometimes deeper than superficial ways.  But as Tonto said to the Lone Ranger, as a large force of Native Americans shooting bows and arrows charged towards them on horseback, "What do you mean 'us,' White Man?"

All of us must look deeper than the surface effects of minor differences and the deeper effects of lack of education, assimilation and estrangement, to perceive our common, essential Jewish identity.

Then, and only then, will we see the fulfillment of the words of the Prophet Yechezkel taken from the Haftarah of Vayigash (Yechezkel 37:16-17):

"Now you, son of man, take yourself one wooden tablet and write upon it, 'For Judah and the Children of Israel, his friends,' and take another wooden tablet and write upon it, 'For Yoseph, the wooden tablet of Ephrayim, and all the Children of Israel, his friends.' "

"And bring close to yourself, one to the other, like a single wooden tablet, and they shall become one in your hand."

And the later words of the Haftarah (Yechezkel 37:24-25),

"My servant David will be King over them, and there will be a single shepherd for all of them; they will follow My ordinances and they will observe My decrees and perform them."

"They will dwell on the land that I gave to My servant Yaakov, on which your forefathers dwelt, and they shall dwell within it - they, their children and their children's children, forever; and My servant David will be a prince for them, forever."

Rabbi Pinchas Frankel
Rabbi Frankel is an Educational Coordinator at the OU

Archive