|
June 29, 1999
ORTHODOX UNION ASKS SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW
KIRYAS JOEL AGAIN
Today, the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of
America, through its Institute for Public Affairs, joined with other organizations
concerned with religious liberty and asked the United States Supreme Court to review the
latest opinion of New York's supreme court invalidating the creation of the Kiryas Joel
School District. The Union, along with the Catholic League for Civil Rights, joined
in a friend of the court brief drafted by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in support
of Kiryas Joel's request to the Court that they hear this case for a second time.
Kiryas Joel has had an independent school district designed to serve the educationally
challenged children of its community with secular special education classes for almost ten
years. The creation of that district, however, has been the subject of continuous
litigation brought by those who view any state aid to religious communities, even aid that
provides only secular assistance, as a violation of the Establishment Clause.
The U.S. Supreme Court invalidated the creation of the
district in 1994, reasoning that the statute creating the district was so narrowly drafted
that it would only benefit the Satmar community of Kiryas Joel and was thus directly
advancing religion. In the wake of that decision, New York State passed a more
broadly crafted bill which permits "any municipality situated wholly within one
central school district but whose boundaries are not coterminous with the boundaries of
such school district [to] organize a new school district whenever required by the
educational interests of the community."
The statute sets forth a range of neutral criteria that
must be met in order to qualify for the creation of such a new school district. New
York State's highest court struck down that bill earlier this year asserting that the bill
had an "invalid origin" inasmuch as it sought to achieve the same goal as the
earlier legislation creating the Kiryas Joel district.
The brief in which the Orthodox Union has joined
asserts that the U.S. Supreme Court should take this case and rule in favor of Kiryas Joel
because the New York court's reasoning is inconsistent with the role of the judiciary in
our constitutional system. The brief notes that while "Marbury v. Madison
established the.concept of judicial review as well as set in motion a process of
dialogue between the courts and the legislatures." The New York court has
short-circuited this constitutional process by asserting that the legislature may no
longer attempt to pass legislation addressing the needs of communities like Kiryas Joel.
A decision from the high court is expected this summer.
###
Comments?


|